Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec;65(12):5421–5426. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.12.5421-5426.1999

TABLE 3.

RAPD analysis of individual Trichoderma-like colonies isolated from different soil, compost, and potting mix samples

Sample description Amt of Trichoderma propagules (log10 CFU/g)i No. of colonies tested No. of T. hamatum 382-like colonies with:
% T. hamatum 382
OPH-19 OPE-16 OPH-20
Nursery soil 1a 3.34 ± 0.50 13 0 0 0 0
Nursery soil 2b 4.05 ± 0.36 23 0 0 0 0
Warner compostb 3.01 ± 0.11 106 0 0 0 0
Bark compostc 3.00 ± 0.29 21 0 0 0 0
Forest litterd 4.52 ± 0.42 21 0 0 0 0
Container mix 1e 3.52 ± 0.25 21 0 0 0 0
Container mix 2f 5.04 ± 0.01 42 0 0 0 0
Container mix 3g 3.80 ± 1.05 27 1 1 0 0
Container mix 4h 5.00 ± 0.18 23 23 23 23 100
a

Forestry nursery at Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio. 

b

Warner Nursery, Willoughby, Ohio. 

c

Composted hardwood bark, Warner Nursery. 

d

Native hardwood forest in Wayne County, Ohio. 

e

Composted pine bark from Warner Nursery. 

f

Composted pine bark from Paygro Inc., South Charleston, Ohio. 

g

Composted pine bark mix from Earthgro Inc., Lebanon, Conn. 

h

Composted pine bark mix from Earthgro Inc. fortified with T. hamatum 382 and F. balustinum 299. 

i

Mean log10 CFU/gram (dry weight) of replicate samples ± standard deviation.