Skip to main content
. 2022 May;11(5):631–641. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-85

Table 1. Basic characteristics, intervention measures, outcome indicators, and quality scores of the included articles.

Author Year Mean age (years) Gender ratio Major comorbidities Population
(E/C)
Intervention methods Outcome indicators
Experimental group Control group
Gao et al. (8) 2019 3.6±1.5 27/25 N/A 23/29 SA CRT ④⑤
Li et al. (9) 2011 0.5–3 46/22 Intellectual disability 34/34 SA CRT ①②
Xing et al. (10) 2012 1–10 38/22 Intellectual disability 30/30 SA CRT
Li et al. (11) 2010 0.5–2 38/34 Intellectual disability 36/36 SA CRT
Qi et al. (12) 2015 0.5–7 40/20 Intellectual disability 34/34 SA CRT ①②
Tao et al. (13) 2012 1–10 38/22 N/A 30/30 SA CRT
Li et al. (14) 2019 2.2±0.5 34/26 N/A 30/30 SA + AJ CRT ①②③⑥
Xian et al. (15) 2019 0.5–5 68/52 Intellectual disability 60/60 SA + latch needle CRT ①④
Li et al. (16) 2019 3.5±1.2 29/31 Strabismus 30/30 SA + massage Massage + CRT
Li et al. (17) 2014 4.4±2.7 29/21 Speech dysfunction 25/25 SA + moxibustions CRT ①③
Jin et al. (18) 2014 1–6 67/46 Speech dysfunction 60/53 SA + LT CRT

Outcomes: ① effective rate; ② MDI score; ③ PDI score; ④ GMFM-88 score; ⑤ ADL score; ⑥ advert events. E, Experimental group; C, Control group; N/A, not available; SA, scalp acupuncture; AJ, acupoint injection; LT, language training; CRT, conventional rehabilitation training; MDI, Mental Development Index; PDI, Psychological Development Index; GMFM, Gross Motor Function Measure; ADL, activities of daily living.