Table 2.
Cases | Controls | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | %a | n | %a | OR (95% CI) | I2 (%) | |
Allium vegetablesb | ||||||
1st tertile | 2278 | 37.4 | 4200 | 32.3 | 1 | |
2nd tertile | 1827 | 30.0 | 3956 | 30.4 | 0.80 (0.69–0.93) | 59.5% |
3rd tertile | 1787 | 29.3 | 4337 | 33.3 | 0.71 (0.56–0.90) | 82.2% |
Missing | 205 | 3.4 | 524 | 4.0 | ||
Onionsc | ||||||
Below the median | 3071 | 53.4 | 5730 | 47.5 | 1 | |
Above the median | 2467 | 42.9 | 5817 | 48.2 | 0.69 (0.55–0.86) | 86.6% |
Missing | 211 | 3.7 | 527 | 4.4 | ||
Garlicd | ||||||
Below the median | 1729 | 58.4 | 3678 | 54.0 | 1 | |
Above the median | 1108 | 37.4 | 2704 | 39.7 | 0.83 (0.75–0.93) | 0.0% |
Missing | 123 | 4.2 | 426 | 6.3 |
aPercentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.
bIncluded studies: StoP ID #2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #17, #21, #23, #25, #26, #30, #33, #36.
cIncluded studies: StoP ID #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #17, #21, #23, #25, #26, #30, #36.
dIncluded studies: StoP ID #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #21, #23, #25.