Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;23(6):625–637. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0059

Table 2. PCa Detection Rate in the Subjects with PI-RADS v2 Score 3 on MRI.

Study (Year) Study Design MRI Scanner Subject No. Subject No. with Score 3 (%) Cancer Detection Rate (%)
Overall PCa CSC
Tan et al. (2017) [36] Retrospective 3T 134 lesions 31 lesions (23) 19 10
Venderink et al.* (2018) [38] Retrospective 3T 1057 male 156 male (15) 35 17
Rosenkrantz et al. (2017) [34] Retrospective 3T 343 lesions 79 lesions (23) 28 11
Kasivisvanathan et al. (2018) [31] Prospective 1.5 or 3T 252 male 51 male (20) 33 12
Sheridan et al. (2018) [37] Retrospective 3T 474 lesions 111 lesions (23) 27 17
van der Leest et al. (2019) [29] Prospective 3T 317 male 40 male (13) 35 18
Wegelin et al. (2019) [39] Prospective 3T 665 male 64 male (10) 25 17
Westphalen et al. (2020) [35] Retrospective 1.5 or 3T 5082 lesions 1490 lesions (29) 30 15

*This study utilized both PI-RADS v1 and v2. CSC = clinically significant cancer, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, PCa = prostate cancer, PI-RADS = Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System