Table 5.

Parameter estimates for the best fitting models with depressive symptoms as an outcome

	Baseline	Hypothesis 3 Baseline	Hypothesis 4a	Hypothesis 4d
Intercept	1.46 ***	1.28 ***	1.25 ***	1.31 ***
	[1.35, 1.56]	[1.12, 1.44]	[1.08, 1.41]	[1.15, 1.47]
Time Point	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.06
	[-0.02, 0.14]	[-0.02, 0.14]	[-0.02, 0.14]	[-0.02, 0.14]
Sex	0.39 ***	0.38 ***	0.39 ***	0.36 ***
	[0.26, 0.53]	[0.25, 0.51]	[0.26, 0.53]	[0.23, 0.49]
7th grade		0.14	0.16	0.13
		[-0.05, 0.33]	[-0.03, 0.35]	[-0.06, 0.33]
8th grade		0.27 **	0.30 **	0.25 *
		[0.07, 0.46]	[0.10, 0.51]	[0.05, 0.45]
9th grade		0.14	0.17	0.11
		[-0.08, 0.36]	[-0.05, 0.39]	[-0.11, 0.33]
10th grade		0.28 *	0.31 **	0.24 *
		[0.05, 0.50]	[0.09, 0.54]	[0.01, 0.46]
11th grade		0.50 ***	0.54 ***	0.46 ***
		[0.25, 0.75]	[0.29, 0.79]	[0.21, 0.71]
Overall Resilience	-0.34 ***	-0.34 ***
	[-0.41, -0.28]	[-0.40, -0.28]
Personal Resilience			-0.30 ***
			[-0.36, -0.24]
Caregiver Resilience				-0.33 ***
				[-0.39, -0.26]
N	2643	2643	2643	2643
N (id)	1333	1333	1333	1333
R2 (fixed)	0.07	0.08	0.07	0.07
R2 (total)	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45

Girls and 6th grade students are reference levels, Hypothesis 3 baseline incorporates overall resilience as a predictor, Hypothesis 4a incorporates personal resilience as a predictor, Hypothesis 4d incorporates caregiver resilience as a predictor. All continuous predictors are mean-centered and scaled by 1 standard deviation. Standard errors are heteroskedasticity robust.Asterisks indicate significance at p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Refer to Table 1 for details on each model