TABLE 3.
Between onset-groups comparison with sexual specialization.
| Type of Specialization Threshold | Sex | Violence | Property | Addiction | χ2(2) | F value |
| For sexual crime | ||||||
| no. ST > 50% (%) | 114 (23.4%) | 3 (3.8%) | 10 (8.3%) | 0 | 547.98*** | |
| ST scores | 0.92 (0.18) | 0.32 (0.20) | 0.36 (0.19) | 0.28 (0.20) | 464.61*** | |
| For violent crime | ||||||
| no. ST > 50% (%) | 1 (0.2%) | 15 (19.2%) | 2 (1.7%) | 0 | 159.20*** | |
| ST scores | 0.02 (0.09) | 0.5 (0.21) | 0.05 (0.12) | 0.02 (0.07) | 303.56*** | |
| For property crime | ||||||
| no. ST > 50% (%) | 2 (0.4%) | 1 (1.3%) | 27 (22.3%) | 1 (2.7%) | 171.97*** | |
| STscores | 0.03 (0.10) | 0.07 (0.15) | 0.53 (0.21) | 0.05 (0.14) | 352.68*** | |
| For addiction | ||||||
| no. ST > 50% (%) | 0 | 3 (3.8%) | 0 | 12 (32.4%) | 294.71*** | |
| ST scores | 0.01 (0.05) | 0.05 (0.15) | 0.02 (0.07) | 0.59 (0.24) | 397.74*** |
The “specialization threshold” (ST) scores was proposed by Harris (2012), and is calculated by dividing the total number of charges for that type of offense (e.g., sexual) by the total number of charges for all offenses.
The 50% ST is commonly used to indicate the extent to an offender has a specialized criminal career.
***p < 0.001.