Skip to main content
. 2022 May 25;13:869701. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.869701

TABLE 4.

Parameter difference between aortic regions.

Rest Dobutamine
Peak Vavg (m/s)
 Ascending aorta 0.70 ± 0.11°° 1.17 ± 0.26
 Aortic arch 0.66 ± 0.12°°° 1.02 ± 0.20°°
 Descending aorta 0.87 ± 0.16 1.32 ± 0.25
 Thoracic aorta 0.74 ± 0.11 1.17 ± 0.22
Peak Vmax (m/s)
 Ascending aorta 1.24 ± 0.11••• 1.98 ± 0.21•••
 Aortic arch 0.96 ± 0.16°°*** 1.46 ± 0.29°°***
 Descending aorta 1.20 ± 0.19 1.75 ± 0.31
 Thoracic aorta 1.31 ± 0.13 2.00 ± 0.25
Peak TKEtotal (mJ)
 Ascending aorta 1.47 ± 0.50••• *** 4.09 ± 1.48••• ***
 Arcus aorta 0.36 ± 0.12°°°*** 0.88 ± 0.26°°***
 Descending aorta 1.16 ± 0.42*** 3.41 ± 1.54***
 Thoracic aorta 2.86 ± 0.67 7.98 ± 2.20
Peak TKEmax (J/m3)
 Ascending aorta 171.4 ± 33.7•••° 316.7 ± 73.4••
 Aortic arch 121.9 ± 43.5*** 200.9 ± 59.8***
 Descending aorta 135.3 ± 35.7* 253.5 ± 80.6*
 Thoracic aorta 176.3 ± 32.6 334.2 ± 69.0
Peak TKEmed (J/m3)
 Ascending aorta 43.6 ± 12.6 112.8 ± 30.7
 Aortic arch 38.1 ± 16.5 82.8 ± 25.8
 Descending aorta 34.5 ± 10.9 91.4 ± 34.1
 Thoracic aorta 35.8 ± 7.2 93.2 ± 23.5

Results of post-hoc analysis between aortic regions for hemodynamic parameters. Significant difference between aortic regions is indicated by: *p < 0.05 vs. TAo, **p < 0.01 vs. TAo, ***p < 0.001 vs. TAo, p < 0.05 vs. AoA, •• p < 0.01 vs. AoA, ••• p < 0.001 vs. AoA, ° p < 0.05 vs. DAo, p < 0.01 vs. DAo, p < 0.001 vs. DAo.