Skip to main content
. 2022 May 25;13:890830. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.890830

TABLE 3.

Effects of shading and light quality on SPAD index and CIELab colorimetric parameters of zucchini squash (C. pepo), watermelon (C. lanatus), tomato (S. lycopersicum), and eggplant (S. melongena) seedlings.

Crop Treatment SPAD index L* a* b*
No shading 41.102 ± 0.564 45.861 ± 0.308a −16.977 ± 0.272 24.034 ± 0.346a
Zucchini squash Black net 41.593 ± 0.483 42.325 ± 0.368b −16.017 ± 0.126 21.625 ± 0.189b
Blue net 42.212 ± 0.054 41.576 ± 0.380b −16.248 ± 0.366 21.469 ± 0.255b
Significance ns *** ns ***
No shading 47.733 ± 0.044b 47.459 ± 0.056a −15.696 ± 0.056b 24.374 ± 0.107a
Watermelon Black net 47.421 ± 0.061b 46.935 ± 0.134b −14.850 ± 0.104a 21.779 ± 0.146b
Blue net 48.932 ± 0.128a 46.475 ± 0.092c −14.797 ± 0.023a 21.245 ± 0.018c
Significance *** *** *** ***
No shading 43.369 ± 0.477a 47.749 ± 0.202b −15.596 ± 0.085a 25.400 ± 0.211b
Tomato Black net 37.055 ± 0.486b 49.749 ± 0.172a −17.784 ± 0.035c 30.038 ± 0.080a
Blue net 37.157 ± 0.127b 49.943 ± 0.061a −17.405 ± 0.059b 29.895 ± 0.044a
Significance *** *** *** ***
No shading 39.955 ± 0.068a 44.750 ± 0.236b −13.294 ± 0.129a 21.855 ± 0.178b
Eggplant Black net 37.336 ± 0.075b 45.848 ± 0.078a −15.623 ± 0.018c 25.464 ± 0.693a
Blue net 36.352 ± 0.087c 43.879 ± 0.122c −14.301 ± 0.122b 22.203 ± 0.064b
Significance *** *** *** **

Different letters within columns indicate significant mean differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). ns, **, and*** denote non-significant or significant effects at p ≤ 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. Data are mean values ± standard error, n = 3.