TABLE 3.
Effects of shading and light quality on SPAD index and CIELab colorimetric parameters of zucchini squash (C. pepo), watermelon (C. lanatus), tomato (S. lycopersicum), and eggplant (S. melongena) seedlings.
| Crop | Treatment | SPAD index | L* | a* | b* |
| No shading | 41.102 ± 0.564 | 45.861 ± 0.308a | −16.977 ± 0.272 | 24.034 ± 0.346a | |
| Zucchini squash | Black net | 41.593 ± 0.483 | 42.325 ± 0.368b | −16.017 ± 0.126 | 21.625 ± 0.189b |
| Blue net | 42.212 ± 0.054 | 41.576 ± 0.380b | −16.248 ± 0.366 | 21.469 ± 0.255b | |
| Significance | ns | *** | ns | *** | |
| No shading | 47.733 ± 0.044b | 47.459 ± 0.056a | −15.696 ± 0.056b | 24.374 ± 0.107a | |
| Watermelon | Black net | 47.421 ± 0.061b | 46.935 ± 0.134b | −14.850 ± 0.104a | 21.779 ± 0.146b |
| Blue net | 48.932 ± 0.128a | 46.475 ± 0.092c | −14.797 ± 0.023a | 21.245 ± 0.018c | |
| Significance | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| No shading | 43.369 ± 0.477a | 47.749 ± 0.202b | −15.596 ± 0.085a | 25.400 ± 0.211b | |
| Tomato | Black net | 37.055 ± 0.486b | 49.749 ± 0.172a | −17.784 ± 0.035c | 30.038 ± 0.080a |
| Blue net | 37.157 ± 0.127b | 49.943 ± 0.061a | −17.405 ± 0.059b | 29.895 ± 0.044a | |
| Significance | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| No shading | 39.955 ± 0.068a | 44.750 ± 0.236b | −13.294 ± 0.129a | 21.855 ± 0.178b | |
| Eggplant | Black net | 37.336 ± 0.075b | 45.848 ± 0.078a | −15.623 ± 0.018c | 25.464 ± 0.693a |
| Blue net | 36.352 ± 0.087c | 43.879 ± 0.122c | −14.301 ± 0.122b | 22.203 ± 0.064b | |
| Significance | *** | *** | *** | ** | |
Different letters within columns indicate significant mean differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). ns, **, and*** denote non-significant or significant effects at p ≤ 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. Data are mean values ± standard error, n = 3.