Table 2.

Data for the 23 of VS 63 patients presenting a dissociation between the average VOR gains of the three canals tested with the vHIT (H) and the results of the caloric test.

VS patients	Side	vHIT (H)	vHIT (P)	vHIT (A)	Canal paresis %
Patient 1	L	0.85	0.85	0.92	27
Patient 2	R	0.9	0.9	0.8	29
Patient 3	R	0.89	0.88	0.89	29
Patient 4	L	0.86	0.98	0.98	29
Patient 5	R	0.86	0.9	0.86	30
Patient 6	R	0.99	0.95	0.72	33
Patient 7	R	0.86	0.85	0.89	39
Patient 8	L	0.9	0.76	0.88	40
Patient 9	R	0.87	0.89	0.96	41
Patient 10	L	0.86	0.76	0.86	48
Patient 11	R	0.89	0.9	0.96	52
Patient 12	R	0.99	0.62	0.73	53
Patient 13	L	0.87	0.96	0.83	55
Patient 14	R	0.90	0.99	0.89	56
Patient 15	R	0.99	0.89	0.89	57
Patient 16	R	0.88	0.57	0.88	57
Patient 17	R	0.99	0.57	0.98	57
Patient 18	R	0.91	0.4	0.81	60
Patient 19	L	0.8	0.5	0.9	63
Patient 20	L	0.95	0.91	0.89	65
Patient 21	L	0.83	0.9	0.89	66
Patient 22	R	0.89	0.92	0.9	77
Patient 23	R	0.91	0.84	0.74	100

Seven of the 23 patients had a deficit for the mean gain of the posterior ROV (Patients 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19) and 3/63 presented isolated decreases in anterior ROV gain (Patients 6, 12, 23). All 10 patients with abnormal caloric tests had normal vHIT (H) results. Side, the side on which the VS was located, left (L) or right (R); vHIT (H), mean gain of the H-ROV; vHIT (P), posterior gain; vHIT (A), anterior gain; canal paresis %, quantification of the deficit in the caloric test.