Table III.
Overview of literature on frailty
| Study | Type | Participants/age | n | Treatment | Frailty tool | Outcome | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bras et al. (19) 2015 | Retrospective study | Patients aged ≥65 years with head and neck cancer | 90 | Surgery | GFI | -Frailty did not predict postoperative complications - The GFI section ‘health problems’ was a significant predictor for postoperative complications -Frail patients experienced more often difficult postoperative recovery |
- Both mucosal and cutaneous head and neck cancer were included - Retrospective character, with no information about the decision-making of both the patient and surgeon |
| De Vries et al. (20) 2019 | Prospective study | Patients with cutaneous head and neck malignancies Mean age 78.9 years | 151 | Surgery | G8, GFI | - Frailty measured by the G8 was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications - The GFI had no significant influence on postoperative complications |
Study performed in a tertiary care hospital, which included a high amount of complex patients and tumours |
| Valdatta et al. (21) 2019 | Retrospective study | Patients with massive KC, aged ≥65 years, mean age 81 years | 587 | Plastic/reconstructive surgery | FRAIL scale | -The FRAIL scale was predictive of mortality or surgical complications - FRAIL scores 4 and 5 were the best predictors of mortality or moderate/ severe complications - FRAIL score 5 was the best predictor of mortality or severe complications |
Overall deaths of the old study population may confound deaths specifically related to surgery |
GFI: Groningen Frailty Index; G8: Geriatric 8.