Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;100(13):5796. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3543

Table III.

Overview of literature on frailty

Study Type Participants/age n Treatment Frailty tool Outcome Limitations
Bras et al. (19) 2015 Retrospective study Patients aged ≥65 years with head and neck cancer 90 Surgery GFI -Frailty did not predict postoperative complications
- The GFI section ‘health problems’ was a significant predictor for postoperative complications
-Frail patients experienced more often difficult postoperative recovery
- Both mucosal and cutaneous head and neck cancer were included
- Retrospective character, with no information about the decision-making of both the patient and surgeon
De Vries et al. (20) 2019 Prospective study Patients with cutaneous head and neck malignancies Mean age 78.9 years 151 Surgery G8, GFI - Frailty measured by the G8 was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications
- The GFI had no significant influence on postoperative complications
Study performed in a tertiary care hospital, which included a high amount of complex patients and tumours
Valdatta et al. (21) 2019 Retrospective study Patients with massive KC, aged ≥65 years, mean age 81 years 587 Plastic/reconstructive surgery FRAIL scale -The FRAIL scale was predictive of mortality or surgical complications
- FRAIL scores 4 and 5 were the best predictors of mortality or moderate/ severe complications
- FRAIL score 5 was the best predictor of mortality or severe complications
Overall deaths of the old study population may confound deaths specifically related to surgery

GFI: Groningen Frailty Index; G8: Geriatric 8.