Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec;65(12):5522–5531. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.12.5522-5531.1999

TABLE 3.

ARCC for known-source isolates from Page Brook watersheda

Sampling period (mo/yr) and source No. of isolates No. correctly identified Rate of correct classification (%) Largest source and % of misclassification
10/96–11/96b
 Beef cows 226 192 85 Waterfowl, 8
 Deer 214 184 86 Beef cows, 7
 Humans 257 239 93 Waterfowl, 4
 Waterfowl 195 174 89 Beef cows, 5
  Total 892 789
8/98–9/98c
 Beef cows 193 151 78 Waterfowl, 9
 Deer 131 106 81 Beef cows, 10
 Humans 152 131 86 Waterfowl, 8
 Waterfowl 166 136 82 Beef cows, 9
  Total 642 524
a

For example, the first row of data shows that 15% of the beef cow isolates were incorrectly classified and that 8% were misclassified as waterfowl isolates. At least four different samples were collected for each known source. 

b

Prior to watershed project. The ARCC was 88%. 

c

Near completion of watershed project. The ARCC was 82%.