TABLE 3.
Sampling period (mo/yr) and source | No. of isolates | No. correctly identified | Rate of correct classification (%) | Largest source and % of misclassification |
---|---|---|---|---|
10/96–11/96b | ||||
Beef cows | 226 | 192 | 85 | Waterfowl, 8 |
Deer | 214 | 184 | 86 | Beef cows, 7 |
Humans | 257 | 239 | 93 | Waterfowl, 4 |
Waterfowl | 195 | 174 | 89 | Beef cows, 5 |
Total | 892 | 789 | ||
8/98–9/98c | ||||
Beef cows | 193 | 151 | 78 | Waterfowl, 9 |
Deer | 131 | 106 | 81 | Beef cows, 10 |
Humans | 152 | 131 | 86 | Waterfowl, 8 |
Waterfowl | 166 | 136 | 82 | Beef cows, 9 |
Total | 642 | 524 |
For example, the first row of data shows that 15% of the beef cow isolates were incorrectly classified and that 8% were misclassified as waterfowl isolates. At least four different samples were collected for each known source.
Prior to watershed project. The ARCC was 88%.
Near completion of watershed project. The ARCC was 82%.