Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;13:69. doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00714-2

Table 3.

Effects of selected major mycotoxins on nutrient digestibility

Mycotoxin Source of contamination Animal model LOAEL, mg/kg feed Digestibility Reference
AFB1 Natural Ducks 0.12002 DM, CP, GE [41]
AFB1 Artificial Broilers 0.04 DM, CP, GE [34]
AF Artificial Broilers 0.5 Net protein utilization; [82]
AFB1 Artificial Broilers 1.5 ADE, N and amino acids [83]
AF Artificial Broilers 2 Protein efficiency, net protein utilization [82]
AF Artificial Laying hens 0.6 ADE and AME [84]
AFB1 Artificial Pigs 0.28 DM, GE, ether extract [46]
DON Natural Pigs 2.86 DM, GE, CP [54]
DON Natural Pigs 4 DM, fat, Energy [57]
DON Artificial Broilers 5 Tyrosine [85]
DON Artificial Pigs 11.2 Tryptophan [86]
FUM Artificial Broilers 20 DM [85]
FUM Artificial Pigs 15 CF, DE [87]
FUM Artificial Pigs 30 CF [87]
OTA Artificial Broilers 2 Protein efficiency, netprotein utilisation [82]
ZEN Artificial Pigs 11.6 Tryptophan [86]
ZEN + FUM Purified ZEN+ Natural FUM Broilers 1 + 3.15 DM, OM, CP, GE [59]
ZEN + FUM Purified ZEN+ Natural FUM Broilers 1 + 5.5 DM, OM, CP, GE [59]
DON + FUM Artificial Broilers 1.5 + 20 DM [85]
DON + FUM Artificial Broilers 5 + 20 DM, ADE [85]
DON + FUM Artificial Dairy cattle 0.733 + 0.994 DM and neutral detergent fiber [68]

aLOAEL Lowest-observed-effect-level, bDM Dry matter, CP Crude protein, GE Gross energy, DE Digestible energy, OM Organic matter, ADE Apparent digestible energy