Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;26(12):3848–3861. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03713-6

Table 2.

Scaled relative importance (RI) scores for each attribute’s influence on choice of multipurpose prevention technology (MPT) design; most important attribute assigned score of 10, and other attributes rescaled relative to most important

MPT attribute Uganda
Women Men Couple
RI 95% CI RI 95% CI RI 95% CI
Dosage by form 10.0 (6.3, 13.7) 10.0 (6.9, 13.1) 10.0 (6.0, 14.0)
Menstrual bleeding 4.1 (2.6, 5.5) 4.2 (3.0, 5.3) 4.7 (3.2, 6.3)
Stomach cramps/nausea 4.3 (3.1, 5.6) 5.4 (4.0, 6.7) 5.0 (3.5, 6.5)
Return to fertility 1.3 (− 0.3, 2.9) 1.9 (0.4, 3.3) 0.4 (− 1.0, 1.7)
Vaginal environment 7.6 (5.5, 9.6) 6.7 (5.0, 8.3) 9.1 (6.7, 11.4)
MPT attribute Zimbabwe
Women Men Couple
RI 95% CI RI 95% CI RI 95% CI
Dosage by form 10.0 (5.3, 14.7) 10.0 (5.1, 14.9) 10.0 (5.8, 14.2)
Menstrual bleeding 7.2 (5.1, 9.3) 7.3 (5.1, 9.5) 7.1 (5.2, 9.0)
Stomach cramps/nausea 7.4 (5.6, 9.1) 8.7 (6.5, 10.9) 8.0 (6.2, 9.9)
Return to fertility 4.1 (2.0, 6.2) 1.5 (− 0.8, 3.9) 1.6 (− 0.5, 3.6)
Vaginal environment 6.1 (4.1, 8.2) 6.5 (4.2, 8.8) 5.1 (3.2, 7.0)