Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2022 May 24;39(8):110848. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110848

Figure 5. Single-cell analysis comparing Myc and strAR Myc prostate.

Figure 5.

(A) UMAP showing alignment of cell types between the Myc and the strAR Myc prostate.

(B) Identification of secretory luminal clusters based on Pbsn expression.

(C) UMAP showing color-coded cell clusters of integrated samples using scVI tools and assignment of cell types based on marker expression.

(D–F) GSEA comparing differentially expressed genes in cluster 6 versus 1 against published Pten-null tumor gene signatures.

(G) Violin plot showing Pten expression in clusters 1 and 6.

(H) Representative IHC images showing pAkt-T308 staining in Myc (left) and strAR Myc (right) tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. Scale bars in insets, 10 μm.

(I) Quantitation of percentages of pAkt-T308-positive epithelial cells. n = 3 animals per group. The p value was calculated by Student’s t test.

(J) GSEA showing enrichment of upregulated genes in cluster 11 versus 1 in a published IFNγ-induced gene signature.