Table 6.
State-by-state summary of results.
State | Number of items | Provides risk score | Structured clinical judgement | Supporting research | Comparison score | Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
South Australia (SAPRAF) | 60 | Yes | Yes | No | 12 | 1 |
Northern Territory (CRAF–NT) | 59 | Yes | Yes | No | 12 | 1 |
Western Australia (CRARMF) | 35 | No | No | No | 12 | 1 |
Victoria (CRAF–V) | 26 | No | No | Yes | 11 | 2 |
Tasmania (RAST) | 34 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 | 3 |
Queensland (DV-PAF) | 22 | No | No | No | 9 | 3 |
New South Wales (DVSAT) | 34 | No | No | No | 8 | 4 |
Australian Capital Territory | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 | 5 |
Note: SAPRAF = South Australian Police Risk Assessment Form; CRAF–NT = Common Risk Assessment Form – Northern Territory; CRARMF = Common Risk Assessment and Risk Management Framework; CRAF–V = Family Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management Framework – Victoria; RAST = Risk Assessment Screening Tool; DVSAT = Domestic Violence Safety Assessment Tool.