Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jan 11;149(6):2166–2170.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.789

Table 4:

Similarities and major differences between available grading scales

Prior CoFAR Current CoFAR (V3) WAO 201722 Dribin et al16
  • Specifically designed for food-induced allergic reactions

  • Grades determined mainly by limitation in activity and intervention required

  • Limited examples of signs/symptoms given for each grade, but not comprehensive

  • Great deal of investigator discretion allowed in determining severity

  • Specifically designed for food-induced allergic reactions

  • Grades broken down by number and type of organ system(s) involved, as well as severity of symptoms

  • Signs/symptoms for each grade provided in far more detail than in CoFAR V1

  • Investigator discretion in assigning grade minimized

  • Update of WAO 2010 grading system

  • Designed for reactions due to all triggers, but primarily utilized for subcutaneous immunotherapy

  • Similar to CoFAR V3 with a few major differences (e.g. isolated abdominal cramps or vomiting Grade 3 in WAO but Grade 1 in CoFAR V3 until there are changes in activity level)

  • Very specific grading scale, broken down by number and type of organ system(s), as well as symptom severity

  • Includes detailed subgrading system based on clinical criteria

  • Designed for generalizability (e.g in the emergency department, rather than specifically for food-induced reactions