Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Mar 7;239(6):1945–1976. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06083-y

Table 7.

Randomized controlled trial outcomes—psilocybin

Measures Outcomes Citation

(Timing from Psilocybin Administration)
ADRENERGIC AGENTS
Ergotamine-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Pokorny et al. 2016
SUBJECTIVE
 5-Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (180 m) Oceanic boundlessness ↓ ∼ 9%, Anxious ego dissolution ↓ ∼ 17%, Visionary restructuralization ↑ ∼ 8%, Auditory alterations ↔, Vigilance Reduction ↑ ∼ 27%
ANTIPSYCHOTICS
Chlorpromazine-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Keeler 1967
PHYSIOLOGICAL
 Pupil function (2 h) Photography measure (mm) ↓91.8%*, After-image effect measure (mm) ↓95.0%*
SUBJECTIVE
 Unusual visual experiences (2 h) Major visual response: ↓52.9%*, Minor visual response: ↓35.1%*
Haloperidol-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Vollenweider et al 1998
SUBJECTIVE
 Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (80 m) Oceanic boundlessness ↓ ∼ 14%**, Dread of ego dissolution ↑ ∼ 27%*, Visionary restructuralization ↓ ∼ 9%
 Delayed response task (80 m) Reaction time (ms) ↓ ∼ 2%
Risperidone-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Vollenweider et al 1998
SUBJECTIVE
 Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (80 m) Oceanic boundlessness ↓ ∼ 23% (risperidone 0.5 mg) & ↓ ∼ 31%** (risperidone 1 mg)
Visionary restructuralization ↓ ∼ 19%* (risperidone 0.5 mg) & ↓ ∼ 27%** (risperidone 1 mg)
Dread of ego dissolution* (risperidone 0.5 mg) & ↓** (risperidone 1 mg)
 Delayed response task (80 m) Reaction time (ms) ↓ ∼ 15% (risperidone 0.5 mg) & ↓ ∼ 24%** (risperidone 1 mg)
ANXIOLYTICS
Buspirone-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Pokorny et al 2016
SUBJECTIVE
 5-Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (180 m) Oceanic boundlessness ↓ ∼ 29%, Anxious ego dissolution ↓ ∼ 33%, Visionary restructuralization ↓ ∼ 44%***, Auditory alterations ↑20%, Vigilance Reduction ↓ ∼ 26%
 5-Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale; Visionary Restructuralization Item Clusters (180 m) Elementary hallucinations ↓ ∼ 48%**, Complex hallucinations ↓ ∼ 53%**, Synaesthesia ↔, Changing meaning of percepts ↓ ∼ 41%**, Facilitated autobiographic memory recollection ↓ ∼ 50%*, Facilitated imagination ↓ ∼ 33%*
SELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS
Escitalopram-Psilocybin vs Placebo-Psilocybin Becker et al 2021
PHARMACOKINETIC
 Drug level (Cmax) Psilocin ↑1.0%
PHYSIOLOGICAL
 Vitals (ΔEmax) Heart rate ↓33.3, SBP ↓43.8%***, DBP ↓23.5%*, MAP ↓37.5%**, Temp ↓11.1%
 QTc interval (150 m) ↑2.3%
Pupil function (Emax) Pupil dilation (mm) ↓66.7% **
 Plasma Brain-Derived Neutrophic Factor level (Cmax) ↓6.6%
 Gene expression levels SLC6A4 ↑7.0%, HTR2A ↓6.5%
SUBJECTIVE
 5-Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (Emax) Oceanic boundlessness ↔, Anxious ego dissolution ↓40%, Visionary restructuralization ↓4.7%
 Visual Analog Scales (ΔEmax) Any drug effects ↓14.1%*, Good drug effects ↓3.8%, Bad drug effects ↓53.8%**, High ↓2.7%, Fear ↓50%**, Talkative ↓47.1%*, Open ↓25%*, Happy ↔, Concentration ↓20%
 Adjective Mood Rating Scale (ΔEmax) Concentration ↓233.3%, Activity ↑133.3%, Extroversion ↓35.7%, Introversion ↑2.8%, General well-being ↔, Emotional Excitation ↓8.6%, Anxiety ↓80%**
 Mystical Effects Questionnaire MEQ30 total score ↓7.7%, no significant differences in subscales except ineffability ↓19.3%*
 List of Complaints (0–7 h) Global ↓25% *

Percent change reported for [psych med] + psilocybin vs. placebo + psilocybin

#

= [psych med] + psilocybin vs [psych med] + placebo; ↔ no change in response, ∼ = estimated percentage change approximated from graphical representation of outcome data

*

p < .05

**

p < .01, and

***

p < .001 (in bold)