Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2022 Mar 11;90(7):1474–1485. doi: 10.1002/prot.26328

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

(A) Comparison between the alternative (left) and null (right) models for epistatic effect, ϵ, as a function of separation distance, r. Results of log(likelihood) ratio test for separation distance with 1000 samples for simulated data for binding affinity (B) and folding stability (C). These plots show the alternative model is a significantly better explanation of the data than the null model.