Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;12:9429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13595-2

Table 6.

Statistical analysis of main effects and first-order interactions affecting measurement error using GLMM.

Variable DF F pa value Post hoc testb
Interceptc 1:4723 319.03  < 0.001
Tooth group 3:4723 296.67  < 0.001 Molar (0.102) > incisal (−0.098), Canine (−0.110) > premolar (−0.149)
Software 2:4723 70.00  < 0.001 DS (−0.019) > AS (−0.052) > LS (−0.121)
MD width/CCH 1:4723 32.92  < 0.001 MD width (−0.043) > CCH (−0.084)
Tooth group * Software 6:4723 24.70  < 0.001
Tooth group * MD width/CCH 3:4723 201.37  < 0.001
Software * MD width/CCH 2:4723 428.81  < 0.001

The tooth size errors were statistically different (p < 0.001) depending on the software used, and the post hoc test showed that DS (−0.019) > AS (−0.052) > LS (−0.121).

DF degrees of freedom.

F F value.

ap values were derived from a generalised linear mixed model.

bCategory (estimated mean) was presented for Bonferroni’s corrected post hoc test.

cIntercept represents the mean value of the response variable when all predictor variables in the model are zero.