Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;3:832880. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.832880

Table 6.

Pooled prevalence analysis of malaria in asymptomatic pregnant women.

References Sample size Proportion (%) 95% CI Weight (%)
Fixed Random
Ahmed et al. (11) 506 7.510 5.369–10.162 2.45 9.04
Singh et al. (12) 274 55.109 49.010–61.098 1.33 8.86
Singh et al. (13) 799 10.763 8.700–13.122 3.86 9.12
Bardaji et al. (14) 1,982 1.312 0.859–1.916 9.57 9.21
Hamer et al. (15) 3,104 1.772 1.338–2.300 14.99 9.23
Kuepfer et al. (16) 6,868 1.616 1.331–1.943 33.15 9.25
Singh et al. (17) 534 9.363 7.030–12.158 2.58 9.05
Sohail et al. (18) 2,141 4.904 4.028–5.906 10.34 9.21
Singh et al. (19) 3,721 1.478 1.115–1.920 17.97 9.24
Corrêa et al. (20) 575 28.696 25.029–32.583 2.78 9.07
Singh et al. (21) 203 35.468 28.897–42.471 0.98 8.72
Total (fixed effects) 20,707 3.192 2.957–3.440 100.00 100.00
Total (random effects) 20,707 10.619 6.053–16.277 100.00 100.00
Test for heterogeneity
Q 1,322.3511
DF 10
Significance level P < 0.0001
I2 (inconsistency) 99.24%
95% CI for I2 99.07–99.38
Publication bias
Egger's test
Intercept 20.1003
95% CI 11.7959–28.4048
Significance level P = 0.0004
Begg's test
Kendall's Tau 0.6727
Significance level P = 0.0040