Table 7.
Pooled prevalence analysis of malaria in symptomatic pregnant women.
References | Sample size | Proportion (%) | 95% CI | Weight (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed | Random | ||||
Chauhan et al. (22) | 120 | 12.500 | 7.168–19.778 | 4.95 | 18.35 |
Guin et al. (23) | 500 | 7.400 | 5.264–10.056 | 20.48 | 20.66 |
Qureshi et al. (24) | 1,222 | 10.720 | 9.041–12.591 | 50.00 | 21.17 |
Chawla and Manu (26) | 416 | 6.490 | 4.320–9.303 | 17.05 | 20.50 |
Datta et al. (28) | 183 | 34.973 | 28.085–42.356 | 7.52 | 19.33 |
Total (fixed effects) | 2,441 | 10.737 | 9.538–12.032 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Total (random effects) | 2,441 | 13.131 | 7.192–20.519 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Test for heterogeneity | |||||
Q | 82.2593 | ||||
DF | 4 | ||||
Significance level | P < 0.0001 | ||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 95.14% | ||||
95% CI for I2 | 91.30–97.28 | ||||
Publication bias | |||||
Egger's test | |||||
Intercept | 4.5794 | ||||
95% CI | −13.1941–22.3530 | ||||
Significance level | P = 0.4723 | ||||
Begg's test | |||||
Kendall's Tau | 0.2000 | ||||
Significance level | P = 0.6242 |