Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;44(3):550–568. doi: 10.1007/s10447-022-09471-3

Table 2.

Results comparing SETU items scores for years 2017 (pre-experiential learning) and 2018–2020 (experiential learning)

Items 2017
(n = 13)
2018
(n = 32)
2019
(n = 30)
2020
(n = 32)
M SD M SD M SD M SD F (3, 103)
1. The Learning Outcomes for this unit were clear to me 2.85a 1.34 3.94b 0.72 4.40c 0.50 4.47c 0.72 16.01***
2. The instructions for Assessment tasks were clear to me 2.23a 1.24 3.56b 1.13 3.60b 1.15 3.66b 1.26 5.10***
3. The Assessment in this unit allowed me to demonstrate the learning outcomes 2.31a 1.38 3.84b 1.14 4.47c 0.68 4.34c 0.60 18.91***
4. The Feedback helped me achieve the Learning Outcomes for the unit 2.15a 1.21 3.63b 1.34 4.43c 0.50 4.19c 0.86 17.55***
5. The Resources helped me achieve the Learning Outcomes for the unit 2.62a 1.45 3.53b 0.76 4.27c 0.69 4.09c 0.93 12.25***
6. The Activities helped me achieve the Learning Outcomes for the unit 2.54a 1.39 3.88b 0.94 4.57c 0.57 4.44c 0.91 17.34***
7. I attempted to engage in this unit to the best of my ability 3.46a 1.27 3.94a 0.80 4.37b 0.67 4.41b 0.61 5.98***
8. Overall, I was satisfied with this unit 2.23a 1.36 3.31b 1.38 4.23c 0.77 4.19c 0.90 13.63***
9. This unit helped improve my capacity for critical thinking 2.31a 1.32 3.81b 0.78 4.27c 0.58 4.22bc 1.04 16.73***
10. I was encouraged to actively participate in this unit 2.46a 1.45 3.69b 0.86 4.40c 0.62 4.47c 0.67 21.39***

Note. ***p .001; a, b, c: different letters mean significant difference at post-hoc paired comparison, whereas the same letter means no significant difference between the paired comparison