Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;2022(6):CD013609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013609.pub2

Dehghan 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: randomised trial
Study duration: 2010
Power calculation: no prospective calculation of sample size
Participants Setting: Ayatollah Kashani hospital, Iran
Sample size: 90 children
Inclusion criteria: children aged 2 to 10 with Gartland 3 supracondylar fractures
Exclusion criteria: delayed presentation more than 5 days, previous arm fracture, head injury, underlying disease, unavailability to attend follow‐up, referral to other centres due to complications
Interventions Group 1 (45 children): closed manipulation of fracture in theatre with fixation using wires
Group 2 (45 children): posterior approach open reduction of fracture in theatre with fixation using wires
Outcomes 1) Major complications (pin site infection)
Notes Loss to follow‐up: no loss to follow‐up reported
Funding source: not stated
Declarations: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "through Random Number Table allocated in two groups"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient detail on allocation concealment to assess
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: it is not clear who performed the interventions and their relationship to the study team.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk Comment: it is not clear who performed the outcomes assessment and their relationship to the study team.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Comment: no reported loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no published protocol or prospective trial registration was identified. The trial was registered after recruitment was complete.
Other bias Low risk None identified