Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;12(4):469–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.05.014

Table 2.

General characteristics of included studies.

S.No Author/Year Study Subjects Number of Teeth Mean Age and Gender Study Groups Study Design Study Duration Method of Evaluation
1 Goymen et al. 201927 30 30 teeth 14 males; 16 females
Mean age 16.27 ± 0.87 years
Group 1–10 teeth
LLLT and OIRR;
Group 2–10 teeth
LED and OIRR;
Group 3–10 teeth
Placebo and OIRR
Randomized controlled trial 4 weeks Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)
3D Quantitative
2 Fernandes et al. 201926 30 30 teeth Age range- 35–65 years. G1 Control (n = 10) - Without orthodontic movement and without premature contact;
G2 (n = 10) - Orthodontic movement only;
G3 (n = 10) - Orthodontic movement plus laser irradiation (LLLT)
Randomized clinical trial (?) 90 days Conventional computed tomography
3D Quantitative
3 Khaw et al. 201825 20 40 teeth 8 males; 12 females
Mean age –
15 years 9 months
Group 1–20 teeth
LLLT and OIRR;
Group 2 - 20 teeth
Sham and OIRR
Double blind, split mouth randomized controlled trial 6 weeks Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
4 Okla et al. 201824 Initial – 38
Dropouts – 12
Final sample – 26
52 teeth Mean age:
Experimental group- 16.7 ± 6.75 years.
Control group-13.2 ± 0.99 years.
Experimental group (n-12) – LLLT (Orthopulse) and OIRR;
Control Group (n-11) - Placebo and OIRR
Randomized controlled trial (?) 6 months Digital periapical radiographs, 2D Quantitative
5 Ng et al. 201723 20 40 teeth 10 males - 16.4 ± 1.3years
10 females - 16.7 ± 1.1 years
Group 1–20 teeth
LLLT and OIRR;
Group 2 - 20 teeth Placebo and OIRR
Double blind, split mouth randomized controlled trial 28 days Micro-computed tomography, 3D Quantitative
6 Sousa et al. 200721 10 26 teeth 6 female and 4 male patients
Mean age of 13.1 years
Laser Group (LG) - 13 teeth
LLLT and OTM with OIRR;
Control Group (CG) – 13 teeth Placebo and OTM with OIRR
Randomized controlled trial (?) 4 months Periapical radiographs, 2D Quantitative