Table 2.
S.No | Author/Year | Study Subjects | Number of Teeth | Mean Age and Gender | Study Groups | Study Design | Study Duration | Method of Evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Goymen et al. 201927 | 30 | 30 teeth | 14 males; 16 females Mean age 16.27 ± 0.87 years |
Group 1–10 teeth LLLT and OIRR; Group 2–10 teeth LED and OIRR; Group 3–10 teeth Placebo and OIRR |
Randomized controlled trial | 4 weeks | Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) 3D Quantitative |
2 | Fernandes et al. 201926 | 30 | 30 teeth | Age range- 35–65 years. | G1 Control (n = 10) - Without orthodontic movement and without premature contact; G2 (n = 10) - Orthodontic movement only; G3 (n = 10) - Orthodontic movement plus laser irradiation (LLLT) |
Randomized clinical trial (?) | 90 days | Conventional computed tomography 3D Quantitative |
3 | Khaw et al. 201825 | 20 | 40 teeth | 8 males; 12 females Mean age – 15 years 9 months |
Group 1–20 teeth LLLT and OIRR; Group 2 - 20 teeth Sham and OIRR |
Double blind, split mouth randomized controlled trial | 6 weeks | Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). |
4 | Okla et al. 201824 | Initial – 38 Dropouts – 12 Final sample – 26 |
52 teeth | Mean age: Experimental group- 16.7 ± 6.75 years. Control group-13.2 ± 0.99 years. |
Experimental group (n-12) – LLLT (Orthopulse) and OIRR; Control Group (n-11) - Placebo and OIRR |
Randomized controlled trial (?) | 6 months | Digital periapical radiographs, 2D Quantitative |
5 | Ng et al. 201723 | 20 | 40 teeth | 10 males - 16.4 ± 1.3years 10 females - 16.7 ± 1.1 years |
Group 1–20 teeth LLLT and OIRR; Group 2 - 20 teeth Placebo and OIRR |
Double blind, split mouth randomized controlled trial | 28 days | Micro-computed tomography, 3D Quantitative |
6 | Sousa et al. 200721 | 10 | 26 teeth | 6 female and 4 male patients Mean age of 13.1 years |
Laser Group (LG) - 13 teeth LLLT and OTM with OIRR; Control Group (CG) – 13 teeth Placebo and OTM with OIRR |
Randomized controlled trial (?) | 4 months | Periapical radiographs, 2D Quantitative |