Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;22:258. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02482-z

Table 2.

Ophthalmological outcomes

All
N = 304
Observation
N = 45
Macular laser
N = 100
Anti-VEGF
N = 124
Macular laser and anti-VEGF
N = 35
Age at DME onset**, mean (SD) 47.4 (14.4) 47.5 (16.1) 43.0 (12.1) 49.9. (14.5) 44.7 (13.2)
Given anti-VEGF-injections, mean (SDa) 6.0 (4.2) 6.5 (6.5)
Visual impaired eyes, n (%)
 at DME onset 22 (7.2) 4 (8.9) 3 (3.0) 11 (8.9) 4 (11.4)
 after the first DME 16 (5.3) 3 (6.7) 4 (4.0) 7 (5.6) 2 (5.7)
 at the end of follow-up 7 (2.3) 2 (4.4) 3 (3.0) 2 (1.6) 0 (0)
Recurrence of DME, n (%) 193 (63.5) 41 (91.1) 59 (59) 80 (64.5) 13 (37.1)
BCVA , mean (SDa)
 at DME onset 76.4 (12.5) 81.6 (8.8) 80.8 (13.1) 72.8 (11.1) 72.4 (13.2)
 at the end of first episode 79.7 (11.5) 80.8 (12.6) 80.7 (13.7) 78.9 (9.9) 78.5 (8.9)
 at the end of follow-up 78.9 (12.2) 78.3 (17.7) 80.2 (13.4) 78.3 (10.1) 78.7 (9.0)
ETDRS letters gain after first episode, mean (95% CIb) 2.9 (2.1 to 3.8) 0.1 (-3.6 to 3.8) -0.4 (-1.9 to 1.1) 4.9 (3.9 to 6.0) 5.5 (2.9 to 8.1)
p-value <0.001* >0.90 0.61 <0.001* <0.001*
ETDRS letters gain at the end of follow-up, mean (95% CIb) 1.8 (1.0 to 2.7) -3.7 (-7.4 to 0.04) -1.1 (-2.7 to 0.4) 4.1 (3.1 to 5.2) 5.1 (2.5 to 7.8)
p-value <0.001* >0.90 0.14 <0.001* <0.001*

VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor, DME Diabetic macular edema, BCVA Best corrected visual acuity with ETDRS letters

*Statistical significance (p-value < 0.05)

**No statistical significance between groups (p = 0.38, ANOVA)

aStandard deviation

b95% confidence interval