Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;35(4):866–875. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa040

Table IV. Outcomes of the assessed PROs using EQ-VAS.

EQ-VAS * T0 (baseline) T1 (FET) T2 (pregnancy test) Treatment effect Time effect Interaction
Mean (SD)
Home-based monitoring n = 116; 83.35 (10.83) n = 97; 81.79 (10.27) n = 91; 80.43 (12.54) P = 0.99 P = 0.34 P = 0.36
Hospital-based monitoring n = 116; 81.48 (12.89) n = 90; 82.88 (11.88) n = 84; 81.18 (11.51)
Median (−25th, −75th)
Home-based monitoring n = 116; 82.50 (80.00–90.00) n = 97; 80.00 (75.00–90.00) n = 91; 80.00 (73.00–90.00)
Hospital-based monitoring n = 116; 80.50 (75.00–90.00) n = 90; 84.50 (75.00–92.00) n = 84; 81.00 (76.00–89.8)

Data for the two randomisation groups of the Antarctica-2 RCT before randomisation (T = 0), after completion of ovulation monitoring but before FET (T = 1) and before pregnancy test (T = 2).

VAS, visual analogue scale.

*Scale ranging from 0 (worst possible health status) to 100 (best possible health status).