Table V. Outcomes of the assessed PREs.

PRE items Mean (SD)	T1 (FET)	T2 (pregnancy test)	Treatment effect	Time effect	Interaction
Anxiety/sadness about missing ovulation*
Home-based monitoring	n = 95; 1.73 (0.85)	n = 89; 1.97 (0.96)	P = 0.66	P = 0.047	P = 0.594
Hospital-based monitoring	n = 88; 1.60 (0.82)	n = 85; 1.74 (0.93)
Empowerment during treatment**
Home-based monitoring	n = 95; 3.23 (0.92)	n = 89; 3.29 (0.92)	P = 0.001	P = 0.41	P = 0.83
Hospital-based monitoring	n = 88; 2.90 (0.90)	n = 85; 3.00 (0.95)
Discretion of method**
Home-based monitoring	n = 94; 4.13 (0.79)	n = 88; 4.18 (0.78)	P = 0.000	P = 0.66	P = 0.30
Hospital-based monitoring	n = 86; 3.84 (0.85)	n = 85; 3.71 (0.90)
Satisfaction with method**
Home-based monitoring	n = 94; 3.83 (1.05)	n = 88; 3.95 (0.97)	P = 0.17	P = 0.97	P = 0.187
Hospital-based monitoring	n = 86; 3.83 (0.75)	n = 85; 3.69 (0.82)
Partner?
Home-based monitoring	Yes n = 89, No n = 5	Yes n = 86, No n = 3	NA	NA	NA
Hospital-based monitoring	Yes n = 81, No n = 6	Yes n = 79, No n = 6
Partner involvement during treatment**
Home-based monitoring	n = 89; 3.99 (0.96)	n = 85; 4.01 (0.85)	P = 0.069	P = 0.71	P = 0.485
Hospital-based monitoring	n = 80; 4.24 (0.83)	n = 78; 4.21 (0.93)

Data for the two randomisation groups of the Antarctica-2 RCT after completion of ovulation monitoring but before FET (T = 1) and before pregnancy test (T = 2).

^*Scores scale: 1 = indicating no problem; 2 = indicating slight problems; 3 = indicating moderate problems; 4 = indicating severe problems; 5 = indicating extreme problems. ^**Scores scale: 1 = no empowerment/discretion/satisfaction/partner involvement at all; 2 = no empowerment/discretion/satisfaction/partner involvement; 3 = neutral; 4 = experienced empowerment/discretion/satisfaction/partner involvement; 5 = experienced very much empowerment/discretion/satisfaction/partner involvement.