Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 May 14;46(5):783–796. doi: 10.1111/acer.14804

Table 3.

Tolerability Results (N=47)

Skyn SCRAM CAM Mobile Diary Test Statistic P
Life disruptions*
Physical discomfort 2 (4%) 25 (53%) N/A§ McNemar’s test <.001
Social discomfort 0 (0%) 19 (40%) N/A§ McNemar’s test <.001
Interference with daily activities
 Work 0 (0%) 5 (11%) N/A§ McNemar’s test .06
 Exercise 1 (2%) 18 (38%) N/A§ McNemar’s test <.001
 Sleep 1 (2%) 15 (32%) N/A§ McNemar’s test .001
 Ability to concentrate 0 (0%) 4 (9%) N/A§ McNemar’s test .13
 Clothing choice 0 (0%) 24 (51%) N/A§ McNemar’s test <.001
 Noticeable in any way 6 (13%) 24 (51%) N/A§ McNemar’s test <.001
Opportunity cost (1–5 scale) 1.8 (1.1) 3.0 (1.4) 1.7 (1.0) χ2 (2) = 34.3 <.001
Overall burden (1–5 scale) 1.6 (0.5) 2.8 (0.9) 2.7 (0.3) χ2 (2) = 59.4 <.001
Adverse effects (1–10 scale)
Itching 1.6 (1.4) 2.9 (2.1) N/A W = 3.4 .001
Sweating 1.5 (1.1) 3.0 (2.0) N/A W = 4.3 <.001
Skin Irritation 1.6 (1.5) 3.6 (2.8) N/A W = 4.0 <.001
Marks on skin 7 (15%) 22 (47%) N/A McNemar’s test <.001
Willing to wear in the future (1–5 scale) 4.3 (0.9) 3.7 (1.2) 3.7 (1.0) χ2 (2) = 17.3 <.001

Values given as mean (SD)

*

N (%) answering “agree” or “strongly agree”

Different than SCRAM CAM (P < .01)

Different than diary (P < .01)

§

These items were previously (Barnett et al., 2017) designed for tracking devices and often unapplicable to the diaries. For example, a diary would not cause physical discomfort. Therefore, diaries were evaluated by a separate set of questions we designed (ease of completion, ease of remembering to complete, enjoyability, burdensomeness).

Calculated as average of 5-point responses to prior rows and diary-specific questions mentioned in previous footnote.

The possible inconvenience of removing the Skyn when interacting with water was not directly queried, but only 4 / 47 participants (9%) noted water as an inconvenience on free responses.