Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;12(11):1421. doi: 10.3390/ani12111421

Table 8.

Effect of family size on the principal components’ definition.

Principal Component Family Size n Mean Rank Kruskal–Wallis H p-Value
PC1-Responsive to quality attributes 1 component 51 254.45 5.232 0.207
2 components 97 262.99
3 components 107 277.87
4 components 222 280.26
5 or more components 60 233.62
Total 537
PC2-Local is better 1 component 51 247.69 5.515 0.210
2 components 97 281.06
3 components 107 278.76
4 components 222 256.20
5 or more components 60 241.57
Total 537
PC3-Local is sustainable 1 component 51 244.9 4.637 0.346
2 components 97 278.5
3 components 107 276.8
4 components 222 275.1
5 or more components 60 237.8
Total 537
PC4-Availability request 1 component 51 278.78 2.352 0.671
2 components 97 266.81
3 components 107 256.19
4 components 222 267.52
5 or more components 60 292.53
Total 537