Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;14(11):2708. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112708

Table 1.

Summary of evidence grading for meta-analysis of risk factors associated with ovarian cancer incidence or mortality–cohort studies only *.

Evidence Criteria Used Decreased Risk Increased Risk
Strong p < 10−6 ||; >1000 cases; I2 < 50%; no small study effects ; prediction interval excludes the null value; no excess significance bias
n = 6
Past drug history
OCP inc Ever vs. never **
Anthropometric measure
Height inc Per 10 cm
BMI; ≥30 kg/m2 vs. normal
Past drug history
HRT inc Ever vs. never (prospective studies)
HRT inc Current/recent vs. never (prospective studies)
HRT inc Ever vs. never (prospective studies; info duration of use and time since last use known)
Highly Suggestive p < 10−6 ||; >1000 cases; p < 0.05 of the largest study in a meta-analysis
n = 3
Past drug history
Metformin inc Ever vs. never
Past drug history
HRT inc Ever vs. never ET only
Medical history
Endometriosis inc Any vs. none
Suggestive p < 10−3 ||; >1000 cases
n = 5
None Anthropometric measures
BMI inc iya per 5 kg/m2 increase
BMI inc per 5 kg/m2 increase
Asbestos
Any vs. none MO
Medical history
Diabetes inc; Yes vs. no
Past drug history
HRT inc; Current vs. ever
Weak p < 0.05
n = 26
Reproductive factors
Breastfeeding inc; Per 5 mo increase in duration
Anthropometric measures
BMI inc PrMP Obese vs. normal
BMI inc PoMP; Obese vs. normal
Per 5 kg weight inc
WG per 5 kg increase PoMP, HRT, inc
Past drug history
NSAIDS inc, Non aspirin; Ever vs. never
OCP inc; Ever vs. never
Medical history
SLE inc; observed vs. expected
Asbestos
Total exposed vs. non-exposed, MO
High exposed vs. non-exposed, MO
Dietary Intake
Tea (black) inc; Highest vs. lowest
Non herbal tea inc; Highest vs. lowest
Calcium inc; Highest vs. lowest
Non-starchy vegetables inc; Per 100 g/day
Dietary intake
Dairy total inc; Highest vs. lowest
Dairy skim/low fat inc; Highest vs. lowest
Dairy lactose inc; Highest vs. lowest
Meat (processed) inc; Highest vs. lowest
Meat (red and processed) MO; Per 100 g/week increment
Past drug history
HRT inc; Ever vs. never (continuous E + P)
HRT inc; Ever vs. never (sequential E + P)
HRT inc; Ever vs. never (E + P)
HRT inc; Ever vs. never (E + E/P)
Reproductive Factors
PID inc; Ever vs never
IVF inc; Ever vs. never (reference group general population)
IVF inc; Ever vs. never (reference group IVF population)

(1) Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BMI iya, body mass index in young adulthood; BMI PrMP, body mass index premenopausal; CC, case control; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; inc, incidence; MO, mortality; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; WG, weight gain; BMI PoMP, body mass index postmenopausal; CRP, c-reactive protein; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; SLE, systemic lupus erythematous; E + P, estrogen and progesterone; E + E/P, estrogen and estrogen/progesterone; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; IVF, in-vitro fertilization; RR, relative risk. (2) Key: * only meta-analyses meeting at least weak grade of evidence listed. ** % reduction in the standard error. || p indicates the p-values of the meta-analysis random effects model. Small study effect is based on the p-value from the Egger’s regression asymmetry test (p > 0.1) where the random effects summary estimate was larger compared to the point estimate of the largest study in a meta-analysis. Based on the p-value (p > 0.1) of the excess significance test using the largest study (smallest standard error) in a meta-analysis as the plausible effect size.