Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: West J Nurs Res. 2019 Jun 16;42(4):286–292. doi: 10.1177/0193945919856575

Table 3.

Mean Values and Group X Time Interaction Effects on Self-efficacy for PA, Motivation, and Social Comparison.

Attention Control Group
Intervention Group
Pre (n = 24)
Post (n = 22)
Pre (n = 26)
Post (n = 21)
Model Estimates
Measure Range M SD M SD M SD M SD Beta T p
Self-efficacy for PA
 Sticking to it 7-35 3.79 0.81 3.49 0.85 3.95 0.75 3.78 0.74 0.046 0.215 .830
 Making time 4-20 4.00 0.84 3.71 0.83 4.18 0.81 3.75 0.74 −0.186 −0.794 .432
Motivation 3-15 9.21 3.34 9.27 2.89 9.77 3.94 9.81 2.96 −0.430 −0.473 .639
Social Comparison Orientation (INCOM)
 Abilities 5-25 15.63 3.96 15.09 3.97 15.19 3.83 15.52 3.17 0.419 0.572 .570
 Opinions 6-30 19.50 4.61 18.82 3.94 18.31 4.68 19.17 3.14 0.596 0.701 .487
Motive for social comparison (adapted SCMS)
 Distancing 4-16 12.88 3.35 13.18 3.75 12.77 3.02 14.10 3.14 0.923 1.090 .282
 Similarity 3-12 7.58 2.94 7.86 3.22 7.73 2.94 9.05 2.39 0.796 0.907 .371
 Enhancement 4-16 10.38 4.20 10.68 4.32 10.54 4.16 11.76 3.83 0.528 0.536 .595
 Modeling 3-12 8.46 3.33 8.41 2.77 8.65 2.62 9.95 2.50 1.282 1.617 .113
 Future 6-24 18.71 5.40 18.45 5.82 18.58 5.27 20.24 4.19 1.468 1.058 .296

Note. Hierarchical linear modeling used to test group by time interaction effect. PA = physical activity; INCOM = Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure; SCMS = Social Comparison Motives Scale.