Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;18(5):e1010158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010158

Table 1. Description of model parameters, our baseline parameterisation and the alternative values considered in the univariate sensitivity analysis.

Description Baseline Sensitivity Source
LFT sensitivity 30 day positive test probability profile for symptomatics
Faster decay in positive test probabilities for asymptomatics (Fig B in S1 Text)
95% credible intervals from Hellewell et al. [49] for symptomatics
Transformed 95% credible intervals from Hellewell et al. [49] for asymptomatics
[49, 50]
PCR sensitivity As above As above [49, 50]
within-school transmission, K Unif(1,5) Baseline—K = 3
Low—K = 1
High—K = 5
Assumption
External daily probability of infection to each pupil, ϵ 0.001
(such that 10% of pupils are infected over a half term)
Low—0.5 × ϵ
High—2 × ϵ
Assumption
Relative probability of transmission since day of infection, ΓI(d) Γ(5.62, 0.98) - [51]
Incubation period
(time until symptom onset)
Γ(5.807, 0.948) - [52]
% of pupils symptomatic Unif(12,31) Baseline—21.5%
Low—12%
High—31%
[53]
Relative infectiousness of asymptomatic individuals, a (%) Unif(30, 70) Baseline—50%
Low—30%
High—70%
[54, 55]
Initial population level immunity, Rinit 20% Low—10%
High—30%
[47]
Initial population level prevalence, Iinit 2% - [46]
Interaction between year groups, α 0—i.e. 100% of within-school infections are within-year 1—i.e. 20% of within-school infections are within-year Assumption