Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;27(11):3376. doi: 10.3390/molecules27113376

Table 2.

Profile of triterpenoids in I. paraguariensis and various varieties of I. aquifolium and I. meserveae.

Compound, TMS 1 RI Exp. 2 RI Lit. 3 I. paraguariensis I. aquifolium I. meserveae
Alaska Ferox Argentea Rubricaulis Aurea Blue Angel Blue Boy Golden Girl
Concentration (mg g−1) d.w
β-Amyrin 3369 3353 1.44 4a 1.21 b 0.90 d 0.49 e 1.87 c 1.95 c 1.43 a
α-Amyrin 3412 3406 4.28 a 3.22 b 1.87 d 0.36 e 3.07 b 1.75 d 2.18 c
Lupeol 3429 3435 1.05 a 2.18 e 1.39 b 0.42 c 1.86 d 1.35 b 2.53 f
Uvaol 3531 3540 2.21 a 2.42 a 1.03 c 0.37 d 0.99 c 1.70 b 2.48 a
Betulinic acid 3579 3588 1.42 a 0.98 b 0.50 d 0.76 c 0.19 e 0.42 d 0.59 cd
Oleanolic acid 3593 3591 2.03 a 4.89 e 3.45 c 2.87 b 4.08 d 6.52 f 4.31 d
Ursolic acid 3664 3657 1.23 a 15.55 f 10.22 c 7.29 b 14.44 e 16.11 g 13.51 d
Total 13.66 30.45 19.36 12.56 26.50 29.80 27.03

1 All compounds are TMS derivatives. 2 Experimental retention indices calculated against n-alkanes. 3 Retention indices according to the NIST20 database. 4 Values are mean; values followed by the same letter within a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05, Tukey’s test).