Table 4.
Comparative analysis of techniques to mitigate face-based indirect spoofing
| Type/ Focus on | Ref. | Concept | Methodology Used | Dataset Used | Performance | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | [29] | A new partial least squares-discriminant analysis method to reduce the modularity impact in visible and thermal images | LBP, HOG, Gabor filter and PLSDA | (X1 Collection) UND dataset | Thermal-visible Facial IR 49.9%. | Modality gap is more, less efficient to night vision |
| [51] | A novel overlapping digital grid method to detect the presentation attack by utilizing Moiré pattern is proposed. | FE- Moiré Pattern digital grid, CLS- SVM (RBF kernel) | MIT-CBCL, Yale, Caltech | This method provides good results for low pixel ratio. | Not suitable with illumination variance problem | |
| [20] | A non-intrusive software-based method to evaluate the luminance color information from the face image. | Disparity, CoALBP, LBP, LPQ, BSIF, SID, SVM with histogram | CASIA-FASD, Replay Attack, MSU-MFSD | EER For given DB (in %)-Video- 3.2, 0, 3.5, Image- 2.1, 0.4, 4.9, respectively. | The color-texture analysis is not generalized. | |
| [138] | The Light field disparity-based face PAD techniques are reviewed with introducing a new HOG descriptor. | HOG, SVM | NUAA, Print attack, Replay Attack, CASIA | ACER- Laptop 0.05%, Mobile 0.02% paper -0.5% | Unavailability of appropriate Light-field DB, focus- based poor results | |
| [27] | A CNN-based method with color-texture features (RI-LBP) is introduced here. | FE- ResNet-18 and rotation invariant -LBP), CLS- SVM, DR- PCA | NUAA Replay CASIA-FASD, MSU-MFSD | ERR for NUAA, Replay, CASIA, MSU are 0.5, 2.3, 4.4, 3.1 respectively. | The results on cross-DB must be generalized. | |
| [124] | A new database SCFASD is introduced with disparity layer-based supervised CNN classifier to efficiently detect face liveness. | Dynamic disparity maps and CNN | Stereo face anti-spoofing DB for (printed photo, mobile, tablet) | Overall APCER = 0.86 ± 0.80 | More generalization is expected for real-time applications. | |
| [56] | The adaptive fusion of each classifier scores is performed on multimodal biometrics (face, finger, and iris) considering the concurrent (boosted) and discordant (suppressed) Modalities. | Hough Transform, Gabor, minutiae features, Gaussian kernel function, Min-max, threshold | Chimeric multimodal databases | Average accuracy 99.5%, EER 0.5% | It doesn’t support a dynamic environment | |
| [123] | DL-based facial PAD method using perturbation with pre-processing is proposed. | CNN, LBP | CASIA, Idiap Replay-Attack, OULU-NPU DB. | ACER (in %)- 3.89 (Oulu NPU), 0.23 (CASIA and Idiap), 0.97 (MSU-USSA) | Other handcrafted method also has to be evaluated. | |
| VA | [84] | A LBP and CNN-based methods are comparatively evaluated for face spoofing. | LBP and CNN | Replay Attack and CASIA-FA | ACER- Replay Attack 1.3%, CASIA-FA 2.5% | Slow speed recognition, sensitive to noise |
| [151] | Three discriminative (SPMT, SSD, TFBD) representations for face PAD is performed. | FE- SPMT, SSD, TFBD, CLS- SVM | Replay Attack and CASIA-FA | ACER- Replay Attack 0%, CASIA-FD- 2.58% | Sensitive to stereo type, binocular camera is needed | |
| [178] | A deep architecture-based FLD to prevent video spoofing attack is proposed here. | FE-CNN and generalized multiple kernel learning (GMKL),CLS- SVM | Replay Attack and CASIA-FA | Replay Attack 0% CASIA-FA 2.58% | Edge enhancement, texture differences are not considered. | |
| [69] | Several face PAD techniques are reviewed to generalize the mobile-based authentication for various cross-databases. | Mobile spoofing datasets | MSU-USSA, Replay Mobile, Oulu NPU | ACER (in %)- 8.33 (Oulu NPU), 0.26 (Replay mobile), 0.97 (MSU-USSA) | The biased DB has to be more practical and generalized. | |
| MA | [121] | A comprehensive review for the state-of-the-art anti spoofing techniques are investigated here. | Challenge response, blink detection | Replay Attack, 3D mask Attack, Print Attack DB | APCER for Print Wrap and display are 5.27%, 1.21%, 0.71%, respectively | H/W: costly, overhead, S/W: device dependent, Not generalized |
| [52] | A multi-channel CNN method with a new WMCA dataset consisting of 2D and 3D attack for Impersonation and Obfuscation condition is introduced here. | CNN with a novel Wide Multi-Channel PAD | WMCA dataset with thermal, near-infrared, color, and depth information. | ACER of 0.3% | Unseen attack protocol evaluation for problems is not efficient. | |
| [49] | An image-quality assessment-based fast non-intrusive method with motion cues is proposed for face spoofing detection. | LDA, SVM | Replay attack, Replay mobile, 3D MAD | HTER-0.024% (Replay attack) | This process is not suitable for large amount of database. |
PA-Photo attack, VA- video attack, MA- Mask attack, PAD- Presentation attack detection, FLD- face liveness detection, SPMT- spatial pyramid coding micro-texture, TFBD-template face matched binocular depth, SSD- single shot multiBox detector,IR- Identification Rate, APCER-Attack presentation classification error rate, ACER- Average classification error rate, HTER- Half total error rate, WMCPA-Wide Multi-Channel Presentation Attack dataset