Table 2.
Logistic Regressions of IPV and Police Violence Predicting Polysubstance Use and HIV Risk Behaviors
Polysubstance Use | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Main predictor = IPV | ||||||
IPV | 2.74* | 1.15, 6.51 | 3.41* | 1.25, 9.25 | 2.36 | 0.57, 9.66 |
IPV × gender | 0.38 | 0.04, 3.05 | ||||
IPV × income | 1.40 | 0.23, 8.19 | ||||
Main predictor = police verbal violence | ||||||
Police verbal abuse | 1.17 | 0.50, 2.73 | 1.34 | 0.45, 4.03 | 1.58 | 0.46, 5.44 |
Police verbal abuse × gender | 0.59 | 0.10, 3.57 | ||||
Police verbal abuse × income | 0.55 | 0.10, 3.01 | ||||
Main predictor = police physical violence | ||||||
Police physical abuse | 0.83 | 0.40, 1.70 | 0.98 | 0.47, 2.04 | 0.54 | 0.20, 1.46 |
Police physical abuse × gender | 0.27* | 0.07, 0.96 | ||||
Police physical abuse × income | 2.53 | 0.56, 11.30 | ||||
Main predictor = police sexual violence | ||||||
Police sexual violence | 0.38 | 0.08, 1.81 | 4060947581 | 0.00, - | 0.29 | 0.03, 2.59 |
Police sexual violence × gender | 0.00 | 0.00, - | ||||
Police sexual violence × income | 1.71 | 0.07, 37.70 | ||||
Injecting Drugs | ||||||
Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | ||||
Main predictor = IPV | ||||||
IPV | 1.68 | 0.67, 4.22 | 1.71 | 0.60, 4.81 | 2.96 | 0.69, 12.56 |
IPV × gender | 0.93 | 0.10, 7.99 | ||||
IPV × income | 0.44 | 0.06, 2.93 | ||||
Main predictor = police verbal abuse | ||||||
Police verbal abuse | 1.03 | 0.40, 2.63 | 0.71 | 0.22, 2.25 | 1.41 | 0.35, 5.67 |
Police verbal abuse × gender | 2.60 | 0.32, 20.97 | ||||
Police verbal abuse × income | 0.52 | 0.07, 3.48 | ||||
Main predictor = police physical abuse | ||||||
Police physical abuse | 1.06 | 0.46, 2.43 | 0.87 | 0.27, 2.75 | 0.77 | 0.26, 2.32 |
Police physical abuse × gender | 1.35 | 0.21, 8.66 | ||||
Police physical abuse × income | 2.21 | 0.38, 12.64 | ||||
Main predictor = police sexual violence | ||||||
Police sexual violence | 0.66 | 0.13, 3.21 | 1.025E+10 | 0.00, - | 0.49 | 0.05, 4.40 |
Police sexual violence × gender | 0.00 | 0.00, - | ||||
Police sexual violence × income | 1.86 | 0.08. 42.99 | ||||
Inconsistent Condom Use | ||||||
Model 7 | Model 8 | Model 9 | ||||
Main predictor = IPV | ||||||
IPV | 1.42 | 0.57, 3.52 | 2.34 | 0.83, 6.59 | 4.40+ | 0.82, 23.47 |
IPV × gender | 0.08+ | 0.00, 1.08 | ||||
IPV × income | 0.17+ | 0.02, 1.32 | ||||
Main predictor = police verbal abuse | ||||||
Police verbal abuse | 2.71* | 1.10, 6.70 | 2.45 | 0.78, 7.62 | 2.10 | 0.61, 7.20 |
Police verbal abuse × gender | 1.69 | 0.24, 11.58 | ||||
Police verbal abuse × income | 1.75 | 0.27, 11.01 | ||||
Main predictor = police physical abuse | ||||||
Police physical abuse | 1.36 | 0.61, 3.02 | 1.48 | 0.44, 4.93 | 2.60 | 0.79, 8.53 |
Police physical abuse × gender | 1.28 | 0.21, 7.85 | ||||
Police physical abuse × income | 0.29 | 0.05, 1.47 | ||||
Main predictor = police sexual violence | ||||||
Police sexual violence | 5.88* | 1.23, 28.09 | 1862404685 | 0.00, - | 6.28+ | 0.70, 55.84 |
Police sexual violence × gender | 0.00 | 0.00, - | ||||
Police sexual violence × income | 0.84 | 0.03, 19.40 |
Note. All covariates were controlled for in all models.
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01.