Table 10.
Comparison of Dynamic World to other LULC datasets in terms of temporal frequency, global coverage, agreement with our Expert Consensus test dataset, scale and Sentinel-2 tiles mapped.
| Dataset | NRT | Global | Agreement | Scale (m) | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapbiomas Amazonia 2018 (N.Brazil, Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia) | No | No | 54.8% | 30 | 11 |
| ESA S2GLC Europe 2019 | No | No | 59.2% | 10 | 45 |
| ESA CCI 2018 | No | Yes | 61.6% | 300 | 409 |
| ESA CGLS ProbaV 2019 | No | Yes | 66.3% | 100 | 409 |
| NLCD 2016 (30 m, CONUS + Alaska) | No | No | 66.7% | 30 | 56 |
| Mapbiomas Brazil 2019 | No | No | 67.4% | 30 | 20 |
| LCMAP 2017 (30 m, CONUS only) | No | No | 75.0% | 30 | 48 |
| Dynamic World (NRT) | Yes | Yes | 73.8% | 10 | 409 |
Bold values indicate top qualitative performance in each comparison category.