Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;13:3232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30853-z

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

TWIK1 pH 7.4
EMDB 25168
PDB 7SK0
TWIK1 pH 5.5
EMDB 25169
PDB 7SK1
Data collection and processing
Magnification 36,000 x 36,000 x
Voltage (kV) 200 200
Micrographs (no.) 5014 3217
Electron exposure (e2) 49.715 50.3523
Defocus range (μm) −0.6 to −2.0 −0.6 to −2.0
Super-resolution pixel size (Å) 0.5685 0.5575
Map pixel size (Å) 1.137 1.115
Symmetry imposed C2 C2
Topaz particle images (no.) 2,872,868 8,990,305
Final particle images (no.) 92,438 38,126
Map resolution (Å) 3.4 3.4
  FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Refinement
Model resolution (Å) 3.4 3.4
  FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −112.7 −111.91
Model composition
  Nonhydrogen atoms 4,153 4,297
  Protein residues 514 524
  Ligands 7 7
B factors (Å2)
  Protein 147.3 143.13
  Ligand 78.45 108.96
R.m.s. deviations
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.007 0.008
  Bond angles (°) 1.101 1.067
Validation
MolProbity score 1.14 0.99
Clashscore 1.2 0.7
Poor rotamers (%) 0 0.43
Ramachandran plot
  Favored (%) 95.69 96.15
  Allowed (%) 4.31 3.85
  Disallowed (%) 0 0