Table 3. Effects of the AFP on the performance (mean ± SD) of sows and litters.
| Variables | Type of farrowing system | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FC | AFP | ||
| Sow | |||
| No. of sows | 32 | 32 | |
| Parity | 4.5 ± 2.53 | 4.4 ± 2.5 | ns |
| Feed intake (kg/d) | 6.39 ± 0.47 | 6.39 ± 0.86 | ns |
| Backfat thickness (mm) | |||
| Before farrowing | 15.7 ± 4.5 | 16.5 ± 4.7 | ns |
| At weaning | 14.2 ± 3.9 | 14.1 ± 4.3 | ns |
| Backfat thickness loss | −2.1 ± 3.1 | −2.5 ± 3.8 | ns |
| Weaning to estrus interval | 5.1 ± 1.0a | 4.3 ± 0.5b | < 0.001 |
| Piglet | |||
| Litter size (piglets/litter) | |||
| At d 1 postpartum1) | 10.1 ± 1.2 | 9.8 ± 0.9 | ns |
| At weaning | 9.0 ± 1.2 | 8.8 ± 1.5 | ns |
| Average birth weight (kg) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | ns |
| Average weaning weight (kg) | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 8.1 ± 1.3 | ns |
After cross-fostering.
Values within treatment (rows) with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
AFP, alternative farrowing pen; FC, farrowing crate; ns, not significant (p > 0.05).