Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;64(3):574–587. doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e36

Table 3. Effects of the AFP on the performance (mean ± SD) of sows and litters.

Variables Type of farrowing system p-value
FC AFP
Sow
 No. of sows 32 32
 Parity 4.5 ± 2.53 4.4 ± 2.5 ns
 Feed intake (kg/d) 6.39 ± 0.47 6.39 ± 0.86 ns
 Backfat thickness (mm)
  Before farrowing 15.7 ± 4.5 16.5 ± 4.7 ns
  At weaning 14.2 ± 3.9 14.1 ± 4.3 ns
 Backfat thickness loss −2.1 ± 3.1 −2.5 ± 3.8 ns
 Weaning to estrus interval 5.1 ± 1.0a 4.3 ± 0.5b < 0.001
Piglet
 Litter size (piglets/litter)
  At d 1 postpartum1) 10.1 ± 1.2 9.8 ± 0.9 ns
  At weaning 9.0 ± 1.2 8.8 ± 1.5 ns
 Average birth weight (kg) 1.5 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.3 ns
 Average weaning weight (kg) 7.6 ± 1.2 8.1 ± 1.3 ns
1)

After cross-fostering.

a,b

Values within treatment (rows) with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

AFP, alternative farrowing pen; FC, farrowing crate; ns, not significant (p > 0.05).