Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 17;50(2):143–162. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14035

The genetics of glaucoma: Disease associations, personalised risk assessment and therapeutic opportunities-A review

Inas F Aboobakar 1, Janey L Wiggs 1
PMCID: PMC9185665  NIHMSID: NIHMS1811202  PMID: 35037362

Abstract

Glaucoma refers to a heterogenous group of disorders characterised by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells and associated visual field loss. Both early-onset and adult-onset forms of the disease have a strong genetic component. Here, we summarise the known genetic associations for various forms of glaucoma and the possible functional roles for these genes in disease pathogenesis. We also discuss efforts to translate genetic knowledge into clinical practice, including gene-based tests for disease diagnosis and risk-stratification as well as gene-based therapies.

Keywords: congenital glaucoma, gene-based therapy, genetic testing, GWAS, polygenic risk score (PRS)

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world and the prevalence is continuing to rise as the global population ages.1 The term glaucoma refers to a heterogenous group of diseases that all share the characteristics of progressive optic neuropathy and distinctive patterns of visual field loss.2 ‘Early-onset’ glaucoma presents in childhood and early adulthood, whereas ‘adult-onset’ forms of disease present after age 40.3 Currently, medical and surgical treatments for various forms of glaucoma focus on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), which is a strong risk factor but not the root cause for disease development. Addressing the underlying molecular mechanisms that cause various forms of glaucoma may help reduce the global burden of blindness.

Twin and population-based studies have long identified family history as a strong risk factor for glaucoma, supporting the hypothesis that genetic factors play a critical role in disease pathogenesis.49 In recent years, studies have significantly advanced understanding of the genetic basis of various forms of glaucoma. Genes associated with early-onset and syndromic forms of glaucoma typically exhibit a Mendelian inheritance pattern (autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive). These genes have been identified through linkage-based analyses of pedigrees of affected families and, in more recent years, through whole exome sequencing.10 Early-onset glaucoma genes may show incomplete penetrance (probability of a disease-causing mutation being phenotypically expressed) or variable expressivity (different phenotypes in individuals carrying the same disease-causing mutation). Adult-onset forms of glaucoma, on the other hand, are complex-inherited diseases, where a single gene mutation is not sufficient to cause disease; the disease phenotype is a result of the interactions of multiple genetic factors, as well as gene–environment interactions.10 The genes associated with adult-onset forms of glaucoma have largely been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) performed in large populations of cases and matched controls.

Here, we summarise the genetic associations for various forms of early-onset and adult-onset glaucoma and discuss possible functional mechanisms whereby these genes contribute to disease development. We also discuss efforts to translate this knowledge into clinical practice, including the development of gene panels and polygenic risk scores for disease diagnosis and risk stratification, as well as opportunities for gene-based therapy.

2 |. GENE ASSOCIATIONS FOR EARLY-ONSET GLAUCOMA

Early-onset forms of glaucoma include primary congenital glaucoma, developmental glaucomas (including Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome and aniridia), juvenile open-angle glaucoma, and pigmentary glaucoma. The genes associated with each form of early-onset glaucoma and their known functions are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Early-onset glaucoma genes

Disease Study design Gene Chromosomal location Inheritance pattern Gene function References
Primary congenital glaucoma Genetic Linkage Analysis CYP1B1 2p22.2 Autosomal recessive, sporadic Steroid metabolism, anterior segment development 1115
Genetic Linkage Analysis LTBP2 14q24.3 Autosomal recessive Extracecullar matrix protein involved in cell adhesion, elastic fibre assembly and microfibril structure 1618
Whole exome sequencing TEK/TIE2 9p21.2 Autosomal dominant Receptor tyrosine kinase; development of aqueous outflow pathway 19
Whole exome sequencing ANGPT1 8q23.1 Autosomal dominant Ligand for TEK; development of aqueous outflow pathway 20
Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome Genetic Linkage Analysis PITX2 4q25 Autosomal dominant Transcription factor; early ocular and systemic organogenesis 2124
Genetic Linkage Analysis FOXC1 6p25.3 Autosomal dominant Transcription factor; early ocular and systemic organogenesis 2528
Aniridia Genetic linkage analysis PAX6 11p13 Autosomal dominant Transcription factor; early ocular and systemic organogenesis 2932
Whole exome sequencing ITPR1 3p26.1 Autosomal recessive (Gillespie syndrome) Calcium ion channel 33
Juvenile open-angle glaucoma Genetic Linkage Analysis MYOC 1q24.3 Autosomal dominant Extracellular matrix protein in trabecular meshwork; mutant protein aggregates intracellularly 34,35
Pigmentary glaucoma Whole exome sequencing PMEL 12q13.2 Autosomal dominant Ocular pigmentation 36

2.1 |. Primary congenital glaucoma

Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) presents in infancy with characteristic ocular findings, including buphthalmos, Haab’s striae, elevated IOP and optic nerve cupping.37 Developmental abnormalities in the anterior segment and aqueous outflow pathway are thought to cause the IOP elevations observed in this disease. Most cases of PCG are sporadic, though 10%–40% are familial.38 Of the familial cases, most have an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern with variable penetrance and expressivity.39 Autosomal dominant inheritance has also been reported.40

Linkage analyses using PCG-affected families have identified five distinct loci associated with PCG: GLC3A (chromosome 2p22-p21), GLC3B (1p36.2-p36.1), GLC3C (14q24.3), GLC3D (14q24.2-q24.3, but not overlapping with GLC3C), and GLC3E (9p21).19,4144

The causal gene in the GLC3A locus is CYP1B1, which was the first PCG gene to be identified.11 This gene belongs to the cytochrome P450 family of enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of medications, vitamins, steroids, fatty acids and other chemicals.12 CYP1B1 mutations have been identified in multiple ethnic populations, causing autosomal recessive PCG with variable expressivity.13 Cyp1b1 knockout mice have abnormalities in the trabecular meshwork, Schlemm’s canal, cornea and iris, though these mice do not exhibit elevations in IOP.14 In a zebrafish model, Cyp1b1 is expressed in the ocular fissures of developing zebrafish retina; decreased Cyp1b1 levels result in premature breakdown of the ventral fissure, leading to altered neural crest migration into the anterior segment.15

The causal gene in the GLC3D locus is latent transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) binding protein 2 (LTBP2), which causes autosomal recessive PCG.16 LTBP2 belongs to the latent TGF-β binding protein family, which are multi-domain extracecullar matrix proteins that play roles in cell adhesion, elastic fibre assembly and microfibril structure.17 This gene is expressed in the anterior segment of the eye, particularly in the ciliary processes.16 Ltpb2-knockout mice do not survive beyond embryonic day 6.5, suggesting a critical role in early development.18 The precise mechanism whereby mutations in the LTBP2 gene functionally contribute to PCG development remains poorly characterised.

Tunica interna endothelial cell kinase (TEK, also known as TIE2) is the causal gene in the GLC3E locus.19 Rare variants in this gene were found in 10 of 189 unrelated PCG families using whole exome sequencing and exhibit an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with variable expressivity. Each mutation was shown to result in protein haploinsufficiency due to loss of function. This receptor tyrosine kinase is a part of the TEK/Angiopoietin signalling pathway, serving as a receptor for the ligands Angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1), Angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2) and Angiopoietin-4 (ANGPT4). In a mouse model, hemizygosity for Tek results in hypomorphic Schlemm’s canal and trabecular meshwork tissue as well as elevated IOP, suggesting a critical role for this gene in development of the aqueous outflow pathway.19 Rare mutations have also been identified in the TEK ligand ANGPT1 in 3 patients in an international cohort of 284 PCG patients using whole exome sequencing, further supporting a role for this pathway in PCG pathogenesis.20 Angpt1-knockout mice also exhibit a severely hypomorphic Schlemm’s canal and elevated IOP.20

2.2 |. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome

Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS) is characterised by anterior segment dysgenesis (posterior embyrotoxon and iris abnormalities) as well as associated systemic features (facial dysmorphism, dental anomalies, redundant periumbilical skin, cardiac defects and growth retardation).45 Most cases have autosomal dominant inheritance, but sporadic cases have also been reported; variable penetrance and expressivity is also noted.46 Up to 50% of patients will develop secondary glaucoma due to incomplete development of the aqueous outflow pathway. The associated glaucoma may present in infancy or in early adulthood.45

Genetic linkage studies have identified two genes associated with ARS: pituitary homeobox 2 (PITX2) on chromosome 4q2521,22 and forkhead box C1 (FOXC1) on chromosome 6p25.25,26 Both of these genes encode transcription factors that activate genes responsible for early ocular and systemic organ development. Pitx2 and Foxc1 knockout mice each recapitulate the features of ARS but do not survive past the embryonal or neonatal period, respectively.23,27 Disruption of Pitx2 or Foxc1 in zebrafish also recapitulates the ocular and systemic features of ARS.24,28

2.3 |. Aniridia

Aniridia is characterised by bilateral, partial or complete iris and foveal hypoplasia, resulting in decreased visual acuity and nystagmus.47 Around 50% will develop glaucoma in childhood or early adulthood due to anterior rotation of a rudimentary iris stump and chronic angle closure.48 Two-thirds of aniridia cases have autosomal dominant inheritance and do not have any associated systemic features; there is complete penetrance but variable expressivity in these patients.49 One-third of cases are sporadic, of which a subset have a syndromic form known as WAGR syndrome (Wilms tumour, Aniridia, Genitourinary abnormalities and mental Retardation).50 2% of aniridia cases have an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern and have associated systemic features of cerebellar ataxia and mental retardation (Gillespie syndrome).50

Linkage analyses have demonstrated that autosomal dominant cases are caused by mutations in paired box gene-6 (PAX6) on chromosome 11p13.29,30 90% of all aniridia cases are caused by PAX6 mutations, including sporadic cases.31 Individuals with WAGR syndrome also have a deletion of the neighbouring Wilms Tumour 1 (WT1) gene in addition to PAX6.29,51 The PAX6 gene encodes a transcription factor that plays a critical role in activating genes involved in eye, nose, central nervous system and pancreatic development in the embryonal period.32 Heterozygous mouse models demonstrate aniridia-like iris abnormalities.32 The neighbouring WT1 gene is a transcription factor and tumour suppressor gene that plays a critical role in normal genitourinary development.52

PAX6 mutations have been reported in two patients with the autosomal recessive Gillespie syndrome, though these patients also had atypical findings such as corectopia and ptosis.53 Whole exome sequencing of five families affected with Gillespie syndrome also identified truncating mutations in the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor type 1 gene (ITPR1).33 This gene encodes calcium release channels in the endoplasmic reticulum; the truncating mutations identified in this study result in non-functional calcium channel formation.33

2.4 |. Juvenile open-angle glaucoma

Juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) is an early-onset form of open-angle glaucoma that presents between the ages of 3 and 40.54 Compared to adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma, JOAG typically has higher IOP, is more rapidly progressive, and less responsive to topical medical therapy.55,56 JOAG has an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with high penetrance.54 A genetic linkage analysis in affected families identified the GLC1A locus (chromosome 1q21–31) to be associated with JOAG risk.57 The myocilin (MYOC) gene, previously known as trabecular meshwork glucocorticoid response gene (TIGR), was later identified as the causal gene in this locus.58

Between 8% and 63% of JOAG cases are caused by MYOC mutations.59,60 A small proportion of adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma cases (3%–4%) are also caused by MYOC mutations.61 Several MYOC mutations have been identified, which have variable phenotypes. Pro370Leu, Tyr437Ile, Ile477Asn are all associated with early onset disease, whereas Gln368STOP is associated with late onset disease and an overall milder phenotype.61 Pedigree-based studies have also demonstrated that compared to the more common Gln368STOP mutation, the Thr377Met mutation is associated with younger age of onset, higher peak IOP and increased likelihood of undergoing incisional glaucoma surgery.62

Myocilin protein is normally highly expressed in the trabecular meshwork extracellular matrix. A study in primary cultures of human trabecular meshwork cells demonstrated that disease-associated myocilin mutations cause protein misfolding, intracellular protein aggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and lack of secretion into the extracellular matrix.34 This results in increased ER stress, deformation of trabecular meshwork cells, and diminished cell proliferation.35 This is hypothesised to lead to trabecular meshwork dysfunction and increased outflow resistance, leading to elevations in IOP.

2.5 |. Pigmentary glaucoma

Pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) is characterised by bilateral pigment deposition on the posterior central cornea (Krukenberg spindle), mid-peripheral iris transillumination defects and dense trabecular meshwork pigmentation.63 Between 35–50% of individuals with PDS will develop pigmentary glaucoma (PG) due to obstruction of aqueous outflow and IOP elevation.64 The disease typically presents in the third and fourth decades of life, but onset has been reported as early as age 11.65 While rates of PDS are comparable among genders, PG is much more common in men and also has an earlier age of onset in males.66 Myopia and vigorous exercise are also important risk factors for disease development.66

Between 26% and 48% of PG patients report a positive family history, suggesting that genetic factors play a role in disease pathogenesis.67 Pedigrees of affected families have identified an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance, though PDS/PG is likely genetically heterogenous and also influenced by environmental factors.36 A genetic linkage analysis of four families with autosomal dominant PDS/PG previously mapped a disease-associated locus at chromosome 7q35–36, though the causal gene has not yet been identified.68 A more recent whole-exome sequencing study of two pedigrees identified two variants in the premelanosome protein (PMEL) gene associated with PDS/PG.36 An additional seven PMEL variants were found through targeted screening of three independent cohorts (n = 394 individuals).36 The PMEL gene encodes a melanosome component, which is involved in melanin synthesis, storage and transport. Five of the nine variants identified in this study showed defective PMEL protein processing and altered amyloid fibril formation in HeLa cells.36 Knockdown of the zebrafish homologous gene was shown to result in pigmentation defects and an enlarged ocular anterior segment, further supporting a functional role for PMEL in PDS/PG pathogenesis.36

3 |. GENE ASSOCIATIONS FOR ADULT-ONSET GLAUCOMA

Adult-onset forms of glaucoma include primary open-angle glaucoma (including the normal-tension glaucoma subtype), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. The genes associated with each form of adult-onset glaucoma and their known functions are listed in Table 2. The genes listed represent the gene closed to the lead SNP for each GWAS loci which may not always be the ‘causative’ gene for each locus. Additionally, there may be multiple genes at each locus that can contribute to disease. Without additional fine-mapping studies the gene defined by proximity to the lead SNP has traditionally been considered relevant to disease.

TABLE 2.

Gene associations for adult-onset glaucoma

Disease Study designa # Cases/controls Ethnic population Gene Chromosomal location Gene function References
Primary open-angle glaucoma Genetic Linkage Analysis 330/471 European-derived MYOC 1q24.3 Extracellular matrix protein in trabecular meshwork; mutant protein aggregates intracellularly 58
GWAS 1263/34877 Icelandic CAV1/CAV2 7q31 Mechanosensation and IOP regulation; nitric oxide signalling 69
GWAS 615/3956 Australian CDKN2B-AS 9p21 Long non-coding RNA; regulates expression of CDKN2B, CDKN2A and other target genes 70
TMCO1 1q24.1 Transmembrane protein
GWAS 2170/2347 European-derived SIX6 14q23.1 Eye development 71
GWAS Meta-Analysis 1432/8102 European and Australian GAS7 17p13.1 Neuronal development 72
GWAS 1155/1992 Australian ABCA1 9q31.1 Cholesterol efflux pump 73
AFAP1 4p16.1 Modulates actin filament integrity
GMDS 6p25.3 Fructose and mannose metabolism
GWAS 1007/1009 Chinese, Singaporean Chinese PMM2 16p13.2 Glycosylation 74
GWAS 3504/9746 Multi-ethnic (European, Asian and African descent) TGFBR3 1p22.1 TGF-beta receptor 75
GWAS 1225/4117 European ARHGEF12 11q23.3 Rho kinase signalling 76
GWAS 3853/33480 European-derived TXNRD2 22q11.21 Thioredoxin reductase 77
ATXN2 12q24.12 Formation of p-bodies and stress granules
FOXC1 6p25.3 Transcription factor; early ocular and systemic organogenesis
GWAS 3071/6750 Australian MYOF 10q23 Endothelial cell repair after mechanical stress 78
CYP26A1 Drug metabolism, lipid biosynthesis
LINC02052 3q27.3 long non-coding RNA
CRYGS Gamma crystallin; cataract formation
LMX1B 9q33.3 Trabecular meshwork development
LMO7 13q22.2 Protein–protein interaction
GWAS 7378/36385 Japanese FNDC3B 3q26.31 Adipogenesis, ECM remodelling 79
ANKRD55 5q11.2 Unknown
MAP3K1 Ocular development
LHPP 10q26.13 Unknown
HMGA2 12q14.3 Ocular development
MEIS2 15q14 Interacts with FOXC1, expressed in trabecular meshwork
LOXL1 15q24.1 Crosslinks collagen and elastin
GWAS meta-analysis 11 018/126069 European/Australian CADM2 3p12.1 Synapse organisation 80
THSD7A 7p21.3 Cytoskeletal organisation
ANGPT1 8q23.1 TEK ligand; outflow pathway development
ANKH 5p15.2 Regulates pyrophosphate levels
LOC101929614 6q27 Unknown
EXOC2 6p25.3 Remodelling of actin cytoskeleton
BICC1 10q21.1 RNA binding protein; negative regulator of Wnt signalling
MECOM 3q26.2 Haematopoiesis, apoptosis, cell differentiation
CTTNBP2 7q31 Actin cytoskeletal assembly
CFTR Chloride channel
ETS1 11q24.3 Transcription factor
LOC107986141 3q25.1 Unknown
GWAS 1113/1826 African and African American EXOC4 7q33 Vesicle transport 81
GWAS 4986/58426 Multi-ethnic (European, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, African American) FMNL2 2q23.3 Effector for Rho GTPases 82
PDE7B 6q23.3 cAMP signalling
near ELN 7q11 Tropoelastin; extracellular matrix constituent
near TCF12 15q21.3 Wnt signalling
near IKZF2 2q34 Haematopoiesis
near DGKG 3q27 Lipid metabolism
3853/33480 European RSPO1 1p34.3 Wnt/ß-catenin signalling 83
GWAS Meta-Analysis DGKG 3q27 Lipid metabolism
PKHD1 6p12 Transmembrane protein
CTTNBP2 7q31 Actin cytoskeletal assembly
CDH11 16q21 Cell adhesion
GWAS 2320/2121 African APBB2 4p14–13 Binds to amyloid precursor protein 84
Rare variant analysis 10 775/421022 European ANGPTL7 (protective variants) 1p36.22 Extracellular matrix organisation; activated in response to dexamethasone and TGF-beta 85
GWAS 7947/119318 European/Australian COL8A2 1p34.3 Collagen type 8 alpha-2 chain 86
BRE 2p23.2 Stress response
THADA 2p21 Apoptosis
PNPT1 2p16.1 RNA processing and degradation
ANTXR1 2p13.3 Transmembrane protein
PARD3B 2q33.3 Formation of tight junctions
MIR4776–1 2q34 microRNA
KBTBD8 3p14.1 Innate immunity, neural crest specification
TSC22D2 3q25.1 Transcription factor binding
LPP 3q27–28 Cell adhesion
POU6F2 7p14.1 Early differentiation of ganglion cells
SEMA3C 7q21.11 Axon growth
TES 7q31.2 Cell adhesion, reorganisation of actin cytoskeleton
PRKAG2 7q36.1 Regulates energy metabolism; inhibits lipid biosynthesis
FBXO32 8q24.13 Component of ubiquitin-ligase complex
PCSK5 9q21.3 Post-transcriptional processing
RALGPS1 9q33.3 Cytoskeleton remodelling
PLCE1 10q23.33 Lipid metabolism
PTPRJ 11p11.2 Cell adhesion, vascular development
ME3 11q14.2 Mitochondrial function
TMTC2 12q21.31 Calcium homeostasis
SH2B3 12q24.12 Negative regulator of TNF signalling pathway
KLF5 13q22.1 Transcription activator
COL4A1 13q34 Collagen type 4 alpha 1 chain
NPC2 14q24.3 Regulates cholesterol transport
ZNF280D 15q21.3 Transcription factor
VPS13C 15q22.2 Maintains mitochondrial transmembrane potential
ADAMTS18 16q23.1 ECM homeostasis
BCAS3 17q23.2 Angiogenesis, autophagy
CASC20 20p12.3 long non-coding RNA
PTPN1 20q13.13 Negative regulator of insulin signalling pathway
EMID1 22q12.2 Unknown
TRIOBP 22q13.1 Neural tissue development, actin cytoskeleton organisation
GWAS Meta-Analysis 34 179/349321 Multi-ethnic (European, Asian, African) RERE 1p36.23 Ocular development 87
GLIS1 1p32.3 Transcription factor
ELOCP18/RPE65 1p31.3 Visual cycle function
GPR88 1p21.2 G-protein coupled receptor
DDR2 1q23.3 Cell adhesion, extracellular matrix remodelling
TRIB2 2p24.3 Immune function
ZNF638 2p13.2 Regulates adipogenesis
THRB 3p24.2 Mediates biological activities of thyroid hormone
ARHGEF3 3p14.3 Activates RhoA GTPase
ALCAM 3q13.11 Cell adhesion
SCFD2 4q12 Protein transport
FAM13A 4q22.1 Adipocyte differentiation
PITX2 4q25 Transcription factor; early ocular and systemic organogenesis
STOX2 4q35.1 Transcription factor
HLA-G 6p22.1 Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene
CLIC5 6p21.1 Chloride ion channel
GJA1/HSF2 6q22.31 Gap junction component/heat shock response
SLC2A12 6q23.2 Catalyses glucose uptake
CREB5 7p15–14 Inflammatory response
SEPT7 7p14.2 Cytokinesis
PCLO 7q21.11 Synaptic vesicle trafficking
SEMA3E Mediates reorganisation of Actin cytoskeleton
ANGPT2/MCPH1 8p23.1 TEK ligand; outflow pathway development
GTF2E2 8p12 Transcription initiation
SVEP1 9q31.3 Cell attachment, calcium ion binding
CELF2 10p14 mRNA processing
MIR4483 10q25.3 microRNA
PLEKHS1 Unknown
YAP1 11q22.1 Transcriptional regulator
CADM1 11q23.3 Cell adhesion
PTHL 12p11.22 Regulates epithelial/mesenchymal transition
CCDC91 Membrane trafficking
TTLL5 14q24.3 Coregulator of glucocorticoid mediated gene expression
SYNE3 14q32.13 Acting binding protein
SNHG10 Non-coding RNA
SMAD6 15q22.31 Negative regulator of TGF beta and BMP signalling
SLCO3A1 15q26.1 Activates NFkB
SV2B Vesicle trafficking and exocytosis
MAPT 17q21.31 Tau protein; microtubule assembly
NPEPPS 17q21.32 Neuroprotection
EYA2 20q13.12 Ocular development
GABPA 21q21.3 Transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial enzymes
APP Amyloid precursor protein
PSMG1 21q22.2 Proteasome assembly
LOC107985484 non-coding RNA
MXRA5 Xp22.33 TGFß1 target; cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodelling
PRKX Macrophage development
GPM6B Xp22.2 Membrane trafficking
NDP Xp11.3 Activates Wnt/beta-catenin pathway
EFHC2 Calcium binding
TDGF1P3 Xq23 Unknown
CHRDL1 Ocular development, angiogenesis
Normal-tension glaucoma Genetic Linkage Analysis 131 families European-derived WDR36 5q22.1 Cell cycle progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, gene regulation 88
Genetic Linkage Analysis 54 families European-derived OPTN 10p13 Apoptosis, inflammation, vasoconstriction 89
Genetic Linkage Analysis 1 pedigree (Replicated in 2 additional patients) African American TBK1 12q14 Innate immunity, autophagy 90
GWAS 720/3443 European-derived CDKN2B-AS 9p21 Long non-coding RNA; regulates expression of CDKN2B, CDKN2A and other target genes 71
8q22 locus 8q22 Unknown; region is highly active in choroid plexus and non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cells
GWAS meta-analysis 3247/47997 Multi-ethnic (European, Asian and African descent) LOC100147773 1q24.1 Unknown 87
FLNB 3p14.1 Actin cross-linking
GMDS 6p25.3 Fructose and mannose metabolism
ABCA1 9q31.1 Cholesterol efflux pump
SLC44A1 Glucose transport
C14orf39 14q23.1 Unknown
Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma GWAS 274/14672 Swedish and Icelandic LOXL1 15q24.1 Crosslinks collagen and elastin; pseudoexfoliation material constituent 91
GWAS 1484/1188 Japanese CACNA1A 19p13.13 Calcium ion channel 92
 GWAS 13 838/110275 Multi-ethnic (24 countries, 6 continents) POMP 13q12 Proteasome maturation protein 93
TMEM136 11q23.3 Transmembrane protein
AGPAT1 6p21 Role in lipid biosynthesis
RBMS3 3p24 RNA binding protein
SEMA6A 5q23 Transmembrane protein expressed in developing neural tissue
Primary angle closure glaucoma GWAS 1854/9608 Chinese, Malay, Indian, Vietnamese PLEKHA7 11p15.2–15.1 Maintenance of adherens junctions, organisation of Actin cytoskeleton 94
COL11A1 1p21.1 Collagen type 11 alpha subunit
PCMTD1 8q11.23 Unknown
ST18 Mediator of apoptosis and inflammation
GWAS 10 503/29567 Multi-ethnic (24 countries, 5 continents) EPDR1 7p14.1 Cell adhesion 95
CHAT 10q11.23 Acetylcholine synthesis (role in pupillary constriction)
GLIS3 9p24.2 Transcription factor with role in eye development
FERMT2 14q22.1 Extracellular matrix component, cell adhesion
DPM2 9q34.11 Glycosylation
FAM102A Unknown function; induced in response to oestrogen
a

GWAS, genome-wide association study.

3.1 |. Primary open-angle glaucoma

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) presents after age 40 and is characterised by progressive optic neuropathy in the setting of an unobstructed iridocorneal angle and no identifiable secondary causes.96 IOP is often elevated, but approximately one third of patients will never have documented IOP above 21 mmHg, a subtype defined as ‘normal-tension glaucoma’ (NTG).

Early studies for POAG causal genes were conducted using linkage-analyses in affected families. This led to identification of the myocilin (MYOC) gene associated with autosomal dominantly inherited POAG as well as JOAG, as discussed previously.58 Additional linkage analyses identified autosomal dominant inherited mutations in the optineurin (OPTN), WD Repeat Domain 36 (WDR36), and TANK Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) genes, primarily in individuals with the NTG subtype.8890 OPTN is believed to play a neuroprotective role which may be affected by disease-associated mutations. The TBK1 gene encodes a kinase that regulates genes in the NF-kB signalling pathway and also interacts with OPTN; the functional mechanism whereby TBK1 mutations cause glaucoma remains poorly characterised, however. Little is known about the function of WDR36 or how mutations in this gene cause glaucoma. While these autosomal dominant inherited mutations for POAG have high penetrance, collectively they only account for approximately 5% of all cases of adult-onset POAG.3

More commonly, POAG is a complex-inherited trait, where multiple genes with small effect sizes and possible environmental influences are necessary for disease development. Most POAG associated genes have been identified through large-scale genome wide association studies (GWAS), where common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome (coding and non-coding) are investigated in disease cases and matched controls. Multiple GWASs and GWAS meta-analyses have been performed for POAG, as summarised in Table 2. Collectively, these GWASs have identified 127 loci associated with POAG risk that have consistent effects across individuals of European, east Asian and African ancestries.87 Few GWASs have investigated POAG causal genes in other ethnic groups and this remains an important area of future research.

Interestingly, many of the POAG-associated loci function in early ocular development or have been identified as causal genes for early-onset glaucomas (SIX6, LMX1B, FOXC1, PITX2, ANGPT1, ANGPT2, RERE, ADAMTS18, MEIS2). This suggests that common variants in these genes are insufficient to produce an early-onset phenotype but could lead to POAG in later life, potentially due to the impact of additional genetic modifiers or environmental risk factors.

Pathway analyses for POAG-associated risk loci have identified important possible pathogenic mechanisms for POAG development.87,97 These include endoplasmic reticulum stress response (MYOC), extracellular matrix and cell adhesion (MYOC, FNDC3B, AFAP1, COL4A1, COL8A2, THSD7A, EXOC2, ANGPTL7), TGF beta signalling (CDKN2B-AS, TGFBR3, SMAD6, MXRA5), TNF alpha signalling (OPTN, TBK1), vascular development (ANGPT1, ANGPT2), regulation of autophagy (OPTN, TBK1, BCAS3), lipid metabolism (ABCA1, DGKG, NPC2), eNOS signalling (CAV1/CAV2) and mitochondrial function (TXNRD2, ME3, VPS13C).

Interestingly, at least 16 loci associated with POAG risk are targeted by existing drugs, suggesting that these drugs could potentially be repurposed for targeted, personalised POAG treatment options.87

3.2 |. Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (XFS) is an age-related systemic disorder characterised by deposition of extracellular fibrillar material throughout the body.98 Nearly half of all individuals with PXF will develop pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG), the most common secondary form of open-angle glaucoma worldwide. Compared to POAG, XFG is associated with greater mean IOP, more advanced visual field loss at diagnosis and worse treatment response.99 XFS is also associated with elevated risk for several nonocular disorders, including cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer’s like dementia, sensorineural hearing loss and pelvic organ prolapse.98

GWASs have identified a total of seven loci strongly associated with risk for developing XFS/XFG. The lysyl oxidase-like 1 (LOXL1) gene on chromosome 15 was the first gene to be associated with XFG risk and to date remains the strongest known genetic contributor for this disease (OR 2.46–20.10 for the 3 SNPs in initial GWAS, p < 1.0 × 10−21).91 LOXL1 polymorphisms are strongly associated with disease risk in all ethnic populations studied to date, though the risk alleles for all known coding and non-coding variants are flipped in one or more ethnic population.100 This suggests that these variants are either not functional or have different effects based on the genetic background of a given population. Notably, the allele that is more common in a population is always the risk allele suggesting that homozygosity is associated with risk and heterozygosity (the minor allele) is protective. Heterozgyous variants may be less likely to be associated with protein aggregation especially involving the intrinsic disordered domains.

The LOXL1 gene encodes an enzyme that crosslinks collagen and elastin in the extracellular matrix.101 Moreover, LOXL1 is a constituent of the pseudoexfoliation material that deposits in ocular and systemic tissues in this disease.102 LOXL1 expression levels are also altered in tissues from patients with XFS/XFG, with elevated levels noted in early disease and reduced levels in later stages of disease.103,104 LOXL1 knockout mice have an altered blood–brain barrier, lens abnormalities and elevations in IOP, but no deposition of pseudoexfoliation material is noted.105,106

The functional mechanism whereby LOXL1 gene variants functionally contribute to disease pathogenesis remains poorly characterised. Coding variants in LOXL1 have no effect on protein enzymatic activity.107 Non-coding variants in intron 1 of LOXL1 were shown to modulate promoter activity of the LOXL1-AS1 long non-coding RNA, which in turn regulates expression of other extracellular matrix genes and pseudoexfoliation material constituents.108,109 However, the risk alleles for all investigated SNPs are flipped in other ethnic populations. An additional group of non-coding variants spanning intron 1 and 2 of LOXL1 were found to alter binding of the transcription factor retinoid X receptor alpha and modulate alternative splicing of LOXL1 pre-mRNA, though the risk alleles for these variants were also flipped in other ethnic populations.110 Current work suggests that risk alleles are located in regions of intrinsic disorders domains that can promote protein aggregation.111,112 This result as well as the observation that variant heterozygosity is associated with protective effects may suggest that disruption of protein aggregates by heterozygote effects is protective.112

More recent GWASs have identified additional genes associated with XFS/XFG risk, though the effect sizes for all of these genes are much lower than for LOXL1. In a Japanese dataset, a SNP in the calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1A (CACNA1A) gene was significantly associated with XFS risk (OR 1.16, p = 3.36 × 10−11), a finding that was confirmed in individuals from 17 additional countries across 6 continents.92 The CACNA1A gene encodes a subunit of a transmembrane voltage-gated calcium ion channel. Given that calcium is present in XFS fibrils,113 it is hypothesised that altered calcium ion channel function may promote the aggregation of XFS material. To date, no studies have investigated the functional mechanism for CACNA1A variants in XFS/XFG pathogenesis.

A larger GWAS including cases and controls from 24 countries across 6 continents identified five new loci associated with XFS: proteasome maturation protein (POMP; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.22, p = 2.97 × 10−10); transmembrane protein 136 (TMEM136; OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.16, p = 1.0 × 10−4); 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 1 (AGPAT1; OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11–1.27, p = 1.29 × 10−6); RNA binding motif single stranded interacting protein 3 (RBMS3; OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09–1.22, p = 4.9 × 10−7); and semaphorin 6A (SEMA6A; OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85–0.94, p = 2.3 × 10−5).93 Expression levels of POMP and TMEM136 protein were investigated in this study and both were reduced in ocular tissue samples from PXF patients compared to controls. The POMP gene encodes a proteasome maturation protein, which may functionally contribute to disease pathogenesis given that the related autophagy pathway has also been implicated in XFS.114 Little is known about the biological roles of the other four genes or how disease-associated variants contribute to XFS development.

3.3 |. Steroid-induced Glaucoma

Topical and intravitreal corticosteroids are a common treatment for various uveitic and vitreoretinal diseases, which has led to a rising incidence of steroid-induced ocular hypertension and glaucoma.115 Steroid-induced glaucoma is a form of secondary open-angle glaucoma caused by increased resistance to outflow at the level of the trabecular meshwork. An estimated one-third of the population is moderately steroid responsive (rise of IOP 6–15 mmHg from baseline with steroid treatment), while 4–6% of the population is highly steroid responsive (IOP increase of >15 mmHg from baseline or IOP over 31 mmHg after steroid exposure).116 Studies have found an increased risk of steroid-induced glaucoma among first-degree relatives of affected individuals, and in those with a personal or family history of POAG, suggesting that genetic factors may contribute to steroid response.116

At the time of this review, no genetic associations have been identified for steroid-induced glaucoma, though GWASs are currently underway and will likely identify genetic contributors for this form of glaucoma in the near future.

3.4 |. Primary angle-closure glaucoma

Pangle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is diagnosed based on the presence of an occludable anterior chamber angle, trabecular meshwork obstruction by peripheral iris, and evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.96 Pupillary block is the most common underlying aetiology. It is estimated that PACG will affect over 30 million people worldwide by 2040.117 Moreover, population based studies have shown that, compared to POAG, PACG carries a three-fold higher risk of severe, bilateral visual impairment.118 Hyperopia, advanced age and female gender are important risk factors for PACG.118 Studies have also demonstrated a higher prevalence in certain ethnic groups (East Asian and Inuit) and in first-degree relatives of affected individuals, supporting an underlying genetic basis for this common disease.119,120

Two GWASs have identified eight loci strongly associated with risk for developing PACG. The first GWAS was performed in a case/control cohort from five Asian countries (Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, India and Vietnam).94 Three loci reached genome-wide significance levels in this study: pleckstrin homology domain–containing protein 7 (PLEKHA7; OR = 1.22, p = 5.33 × 10−12); collagen type 11 alpha-1 chain (COL11A1) (OR = 1.20, p = 9.22 × 10−10); and a SNP located between protein-L-isoaspartate o-methyltransferase domain containing 1 (PCMTD1) and ST18 C2H2C-type zinc finger transcription factor (ST18; OR = 1.50, p = 3.29 × 10−9).

The PLEKHA7 gene plays a critical role in maintenance and stability of adherens junctions. PLEKHA7 is expressed in PACG relevant ocular tissues and in tissues that maintain the blood-aqueous barrier.121 PLEKHA7 gene expression is downregulated in lens epithelial cells and iris tissue samples from PACG patients compared to controls, with a greater reduction seen in individuals who are carriers of the risk allele for the rs11024102 SNP in PLEKHA7.122 Knockdown of PLEKHA7 expression in non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cells leads to impaired actin cytoskeleton organisation and compromises para-cellular barriers between cells, providing a potential functional mechanism whereby altered PLEKHA7 levels affect aqueous outflow and blood aqueous barrier function.120 The COL11A1 gene encodes the alpha chain of type XI collagen; it is hypothesised that variants in this gene may impact axial length, an important risk factor for developing PACG, though this has not yet been investigated with functional studies. Little is known about the functions of PCMTD1 and ST18, or which gene is the more likely candidate susceptibility gene in this locus.122

A larger GWAS for PACG included samples from 24 countries across 5 continents.95 Five additional loci reached genome-wide significance levels: ependymin-related 1 (EPDR1; OR = 1.24, p = 5.94 × 10−15), choline o-acetyltransferase (CHAT; OR = 1.22, p = 2.85 × 10−16), GLIS family zinc finger 3 (GLIS3; OR = 1.18, p = 1.43 × 10−14), FERM domain-containing kindlin 2 (FERMT2) (OR = 1.14, p = 3.43 × 10−11), and a SNP located between dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase-2 (DPM2) and early oestrogen-induced gene 1 (FAM102A; OR = 1.15, p = 8.32 × 10−12).

Similar to PLEKHA7, both EPDR1 and FERMT2 are also involved in cell-adhesion, further supporting a functional role for this pathway in PACG pathogenesis.95 CHAT synthesises acetylcholine, which causes pupillary constriction; given that pupillary dilation can precipitate an angle closure attack, altered CHAT function could make functional sense in the context of this disease, though studies exploring the underlying mechanisms have not been performed. Little is known about the functions of GLIS3, DPM2 and FAM102A or how disease-associated SNPs in these loci contribute to PACG pathogenesis.

4 |. DIAGNOSTIC OPPORTUNITIES

Currently, gene-based diagnostic tests are available for early-onset forms of glaucoma, where a single gene mutation is sufficient to produce the disease phenotype. For adult-onset, complex-inherited forms of glaucoma, polygenic risk scores have been investigated as a potential tool for personalised risk stratification.

4.1 |. Gene-based testing

For Mendelian, early-onset forms of glaucoma, gene-based testing can help confirm a disease diagnosis. Moreover, screening of relatives can identify individuals who also have the causal mutation and warrant close follow-up to enable prompt diagnosis and treatment. In the future, identification of the genetic aetiology of disease may also inform treatment decisions as gene-based therapies become available.

Options for gene-based testing include the Genetic Eye Disease Panel for Optic Nerve Disease and Early Manifest Glaucoma (GEDi-O) panel available through the Ocular Genomics Institute at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. This panel uses a targeted enrichment and next generation sequencing approach and tests for mutations in 22 genes (ACO2, AFG3L2, AUH, C12orf65, CISD2, CYP1B1, FOXC1, FOXF2, LTBP2, MTPAP, MYOC, NDUFS1, NR2F1, OPA1, OPA3, OPTN, PAX6, PITX2, POLG, SPG7, TEK, and WFS1).123 The sensitivity and specificity of the GEDi panels for inherited retinal degeneration and early-onset glaucoma were investigated and found to be 97.9% and 100%, respectively.124 Notably, the sensitivity was substantially higher than that achieved with whole exome sequencing (88.3%) in this study.

4.2 |. Polygenic risk scores

A polygenic risk score (PRS) evaluates the cumulative effect of multiple SNPs in different genes on disease risk, which is useful in cases of complex-inherited disease where a single mutation is not sufficient for disease development. Several recent studies have investigated the utility of a PRS consisting of IOP-associated SNPs in predicting POAG phenotypes. In one study, an IOP-based PRS was applied to the UK Biobank dataset (n = 435 678 participants).125 Compared to the bottom quintile, individuals in the top quintile were found to have 6.34 times higher likelihood of having POAG (95% CI 4.82–8.33, p = 2.1 × 10−57). Another study applied an IOP-based PRS to 2154 POAG patients from the Australian and New Zealand Registry of Advanced Glaucoma (ANZRAG).126 Compared with the lowest quintile, the highest quintile of PRS was found to have higher maximal IOP by 1.7 mmHg (Standard Deviation [SD] 0.62 mmHg, p < 0.01), younger age of diagnosis by 3.7 years (SD 1.0 years, p < 0.001), and a greater rate of incisional glaucoma surgery (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.0, p < 0.01). An IOP-based PRS has also been found to be associated with higher early morning and mean IOP outside office hours in POAG patients, as measured with the iCare HOME tonometer (n = 239 Australian participants).127 Compared to the lowest quintile, eyes in the highest PRS quintile had an early morning IOP increase of 4.3 mmHg (95% CI 1.4–7.3, p = 0.005) and a mean increase in IOP outside office hours of 2.7 mmHg (95% CI 0.61–4.7, p = 0.013).

A PRS consisting of IOP, vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) and POAG-associated SNPs has also been constructed and evaluated in the UK biobank (n = 67 040 participants).86 Individuals in the top decile of PRS were found to reach an absolute risk of glaucoma 10 years earlier than the bottom decile and have 15-fold higher risk of developing advanced glaucoma compared to the remaining 90% (OR 3.43–5.17, p = 1.4 × 10−42). The PRS was also shown to predict glaucoma progression in early manifest glaucoma cases (p = 0.004) and the need for surgical intervention in patients with advanced disease (p = 3.6 × 10−6).

The effects of polygenic risk on MYOC penetrance has also been examined.128 This study investigated 200 individuals in the UK Biobank who carried the heterozygous phenotype for p.Gln368Ter, the most common MYOC variant associated with open-angle glaucoma risk. A genome-wide POAG PRS was constructed and the prevalence of disc-defined glaucoma was found to increase with each decile of POAG PRS. Overall, one in four individuals carrying the MYOC p.Gln368Ter variant had evidence of glaucoma, which is a significantly higher penetrance than previously reported.

In addition to POAG, a PRS has also been investigated in PACG. This PRS was constructed using eight disease associated SNPs in 844 PACG patients of Chinese ethnicity from Singapore.129 Compared to individuals in the lowest quartile, those in the highest quartile of weighted PRS were more likely to have severe disease on visual field testing (OR = 3.11, 95% CI 1.95–4.96, p < 0.001).

The effects of an IOP-based PRS in modulating gene–environment interactions has also been investigated in the UK Biobank dataset (n = 121 374 participants).130 Overall, there was no association between caffeine intake and POAG risk (p > 0.1). However, the IOP PRS modified this relationship, as those in the highest IOP PRS quintile who consumed ≥321 mg/day had a 3.9-fold higher glaucoma prevalence compared to those in the lowest PRS quintile who consumed no caffeine (p = 0.0003).

Efforts have also been made to integrate machine learning technologies for accurate cohort phenotyping for GWAS and PRS analyses. A machine learning model was developed to predict optic nerve head features from colour fundus photos, which was then used to assess VCDR in the UK Biobank dataset (n = 65, 680 participants).131 A subsequent GWAS of machine learning-based VCDR replicated 62 of 65 previously identified loci and also identified 95 novel loci for VCDR in the UK Biobank dataset. The machine learning-based GWAS results were also shown to improve polygenic prediction of VCDR and POAG in an independent EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

5 |. THERAPEUTIC OPPORTUNITIES

Current medical and surgical therapies for glaucoma primarily focus on lowering IOP, which is a key risk factor for disease development and progression but not the root cause of disease itself. An understanding of the genetic basis for various forms of glaucoma has provided opportunities for targeting specific gene defects or molecular pathways that contribute to disease pathogenesis.

For early-onset forms Mendelian of glaucoma, a mutation in a single gene is sufficient to produce the disease phenotype and, therefore, therapies that target this defect can potentially be curative. Technological advancements, especially discovery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, have revolutionised genome-editing and accelerated the development of genetic therapies, with several CRISPR/Cas9-based clinical trials now underway.132134 A CRISPR/Cas9-based treatment for myocilin-associated glaucoma has been studied using in vitro human trabecular meshwork cell culture and in vivo mouse models.135 Genome editing was used to knockdown expression of mutant MYOC, which led to reduced misfolded protein load and ER stress in human trabecular meshwork cells. In mice, CRISPR/Cas9 editing prevented IOP elevation and subsequent glaucoma development. Similarly, CRISPR/Cas9 editing of a PAX6 mutation was recently shown to rescue the eye phenotype in a mouse model of aniridia.136 Human clinical trials have not yet been initiated for either MYOC or PAX6 treatments but may be in the near future. Genome editing technologies may also be applied to other early-onset glaucoma genes in the future, including CYP1B1, TEK, FOXC1 and PITX2.

For complex-inherited forms of glaucoma, multiple gene variants and environmental risk factors lead to the disease phenotype. It is also likely that defects in different molecular pathways lead to the same clinical endpoint. As prospective clinical studies and translational mechanistic studies better characterise the different pathways that play a causal role in adult-onset glaucoma it may be possible to recommend targeted treatment approaches for a given individual. For example, patients with gene variants in mitochondrial genes may benefit from anti-oxidant therapies, whereas patients with mutations in lipid metabolism genes may benefit from cholesterol-lowering medications.97 Therapies may also be developed based on genes that protect against glaucoma development. For example, rare variants in the ANGPTL7 gene, including a protein-truncating variant, are associated with lower IOP levels in the UK biobank, suggesting that downregulation of ANGPTL7 could protect against POAG development or progression.85

6 |. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Significant progress has been made in our understanding of the genetic basis of various forms of early-onset and adult-onset glaucoma in recent years. Moreover, this knowledge has already begun to impact clinical practice for early-onset forms of glaucoma through the availability of gene panels to confirm disease diagnosis and screen at-risk relatives. Polygenic risk scores are also being developed as a tool for personalised risk assessment in adult-onset forms of glaucoma, though these studies have largely been retrospective. In terms of treatment, pre-clinical studies suggest that gene-based therapies could potentially provide a curative option for early-onset Mendelian forms of disease. For adult-onset disease, it may be possible in the future to provide personalised therapeutic plans for a given patient based on knowledge of their specific gene mutations and the molecular pathways they impact.

Despite this progress, much still remains unknown about the genetics of glaucoma. The known genes for various forms of glaucoma only explain a portion of disease heritability; with larger, more ethnically diverse datasets and continued advancements in gene-discovery technologies, additional genes will likely be identified. The functional characterisation of genetic associations will also be critical for improving understanding of disease mechanisms and identifying novel therapeutic targets. As more genes are identified, refinement of gene panels and polygenic risk scores will be needed. Longitudinal, prospective studies in individuals with high polygenic risk are also critical for better understanding genotype–phenotype correlations and the role of environmental modifiers. Lastly, continued efforts to translate knowledge of the causal genes for glaucoma into more targeted therapeutic approaches may help greatly reduce the global burden of irreversible blindness.

FUNDING

NIH/NEI.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blindness GBD, Vision Impairment C, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease S. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144–e160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weinreb RN, Leung CK, Crowston JG, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wiggs JL, Pasquale LR. Genetics of glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(R1):R21–R27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lowe RF. Primary angle-closure glaucoma. Inherit Environ Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(1):13–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Ramrattan RS, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Population-based familial aggregation. Study Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(12):1640–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC. Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. Baltimore Eye Survey Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(1):69–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bovell AM, Damji KF, Dohadwala AA, Hodge WG, Allingham RR. Familial occurrence of pigment dispersion syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36(1):11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Damji KF, Bains HS, Amjadi K, et al. Familial occurrence of pseudoexfoliation in Canada. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999;34(5): 257–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ko F, Papadopoulos M, Khaw PT. Primary congenital glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:177–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wiggs JL. Genetic etiologies of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):30–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stoilov I, Akarsu AN, Sarfarazi M. Identification of three different truncating mutations in cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) as the principal cause of primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) in families linked to the GLC3A locus on chromosome 2p21. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(4):641–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Furge LL, Guengerich FP. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism and chemical toxicology: an introduction. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006;34(2):66–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiggs JL, Langgurth AM, Allen KF. Carrier frequency of CYP1B1 mutations in the United States (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2014;112:94–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Libby RT, Smith RS, Savinova OV, et al. Modification of ocular defects in mouse developmental glaucoma models by tyrosinase. Science. 2003;299(5612):1578–1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Williams AL, Eason J, Chawla B, Bohnsack BL. Cyp1b1 regulates ocular fissure closure through a retinoic acid-independent pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(2):1084–1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ali M, McKibbin M, Booth A, et al. Null mutations in LTBP2 cause primary congenital glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84(5):664–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hirai M, Horiguchi M, Ohbayashi T, Kita T, Chien KR, Nakamura T. Latent TGF-beta-binding protein 2 binds to DANCE/fibulin-5 and regulates elastic fiber assembly. EMBO J. 2007;26(14):3283–3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shipley JM, Mecham RP, Maus E, et al. Developmental expression of latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2 and its requirement early in mouse development. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(13):4879–4887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Souma T, Tompson SW, Thomson BR, et al. Angiopoietin receptor TEK mutations underlie primary congenital glaucoma with variable expressivity. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7): 2575–2587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thomson BR, Souma T, Tompson SW, et al. Angiopoietin-1 is required for Schlemm’s canal development in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(12):4421–4436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murray JC, Bennett SR, Kwitek AE, et al. Linkage of Rieger syndrome to the region of the epidermal growth factor gene on chromosome 4. Nat Genet. 1992;2(1):46–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Semina EV, Reiter R, Leysens NJ, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel bicoid-related homeobox transcription factor gene, RIEG, involved in Rieger syndrome. Nat Genet. 1996;14(4):392–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kitamura K, Miura H, Miyagawa-Tomita S, et al. Mouse Pitx2 deficiency leads to anomalies of the ventral body wall, heart, extra- and periocular mesoderm and right pulmonary isomerism. Development. 1999;126(24):5749–5758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ji Y, Buel SM, Amack JD. Mutations in zebrafish pitx2 model congenital malformations in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome but do not disrupt left-right placement of visceral organs. Dev Biol. 2016;416(1):69–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nishimura DY, Swiderski RE, Alward WL, et al. The forkhead transcription factor gene FKHL7 is responsible for glaucoma phenotypes which map to 6p25. Nat Genet. 1998;19(2):140–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mears AJ, Jordan T, Mirzayans F, et al. Mutations of the forkhead/winged-helix gene, FKHL7, in patients with Axenfeld-Rieger anomaly. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(5):1316–1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sasman A, Nassano-Miller C, Shim KS, et al. Generation of conditional alleles for Foxc1 and Foxc2 in mice. Genesis. 2012; 50(10):766–774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ferre-Fernandez JJ, Sorokina EA, Thompson S, et al. Disruption of foxc1 genes in zebrafish results in dosage-dependent phenotypes overlapping Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(16):2723–2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ton CC, Hirvonen H, Miwa H, et al. Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell. 1991;67(6):1059–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mannens M, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM, Bliek J, et al. Autosomal dominant aniridia linked to the chromosome 11p13 markers catalase and D11S151 in a large Dutch family. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1989;52(1–2):32–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Axton R, Hanson I, Danes S, Sellar G, van Heyningen V, Prosser J. The incidence of PAX6 mutation in patients with simple aniridia: an evaluation of mutation detection in 12 cases. J Med Genet. 1997;34(4):279–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanson IM. PAX6 and congenital eye malformations. Pediatr Res. 2003;54(6):791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gerber S, Alzayady KJ, Burglen L, et al. Recessive and dominant De novo ITPR1 mutations cause Gillespie syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(5):971–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Y, Vollrath D. Reversal of mutant myocilin non-secretion and cell killing: implications for glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(11):1193–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Joe MK, Sohn S, Hur W, Moon Y, Choi YR, Kee C. Accumulation of mutant myocilins in ER leads to ER stress and potential cytotoxicity in human trabecular meshwork cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;312(3):592–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lahola-Chomiak AA, Footz T, Nguyen-Phuoc K, et al. Non-synonymous variants in premelanosome protein (PMEL) cause ocular pigment dispersion and pigmentary glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(8):1298–1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Francois J Congenital glaucoma and its inheritance. Ophthalmologica. 1980;181(2):61–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Abdolrahimzadeh S, Fameli V, Mollo R, Contestabile MT, Perdicchi A, Recupero SM. Rare diseases leading to childhood glaucoma: epidemiology, Pathophysiogenesis, and management. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:781294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suri F, Yazdani S, Narooie-Nejhad M, et al. Variable expressivity and high penetrance of CYP1B1 mutations associated with primary congenital glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(11):2101–2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Simha N, Verin P, Gauthier L. Congenital glaucoma of dominant autosomal transmission apropos of a family. Manage Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1989;89(10):1149–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sarfarazi M, Akarsu AN, Hossain A, et al. Assignment of a locus (GLC3A) for primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) to 2p21 and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Genomics. 1995; 30(2):171–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Akarsu AN, Turacli ME, Aktan SG, et al. A second locus (GLC3B) for primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) maps to the 1p36 region. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5(8):1199–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen X, Chen Y, Wang L, et al. Confirmation and further mapping of the GLC3C locus in primary congenital glaucoma. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2011;16:2052–2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Firasat S, Riazuddin SA, Hejtmancik JF, Riazuddin S. Primary congenital glaucoma localizes to chromosome 14q24.2–24.3 in two consanguineous Pakistani families. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1659–1665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shields MB, Buckley E, Klintworth GK, Thresher R. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. A spectrum of developmental disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1985;29(6):387–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alward WL. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome in the age of molecular genetics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(1):107–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee H, Khan R, O’Keefe M. Aniridia: current pathology and management. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(7):708–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Netland PA, Scott ML, JWT B, Lauderdale JD. Ocular and systemic findings in a survey of aniridia subjects. J AAPOS. 2011; 15(6):562–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(10):1011–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wawrocka A, Krawczynski MR. The genetics of aniridia—simple things become complicated. J Appl Genet. 2018;59(2): 151–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Francke U, Holmes LB, Atkins L, Riccardi VM. Aniridia-Wilms’ tumor association: evidence for specific deletion of 11p13. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1979;24(3):185–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mrowka C, Schedl A. Wilms’ tumor suppressor gene WT1: from structure to renal pathophysiologic features. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(suppl 16):S106–S115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ticho BH, Hilchie-Schmidt C, Egel RT, Traboulsi EI, Howarth RJ, Robinson D. Ocular findings in Gillespie-like syndrome: association with a new PAX6 mutation. Ophthalmic Genet. 2006;27(4):145–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wiggs JL, Damji KF, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Allingham RR. The distinction between juvenile and adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 58(1):243–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gupta V, Ov M, Rao A, Sharma A, Sihota R. Long-term structural and functional outcomes of therapy in juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma: a five-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2012;228(1):19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Johnson AT, Drack AV, Kwitek AE, Cannon RL, Stone EM, Alward WL. Clinical features and linkage analysis of a family with autosomal dominant juvenile glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(4):524–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sheffield VC, Stone EM, Alward WL, et al. Genetic linkage of familial open angle glaucoma to chromosome 1q21-q31. Nat Genet. 1993;4(1):47–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science. 1997; 275(5300):668–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wiggs JL, Allingham RR, Vollrath D, et al. Prevalence of mutations in TIGR/Myocilin in patients with adult and juvenile primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 63(5):1549–1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Adam MF, Belmouden A, Binisti P, et al. Recurrent mutations in a single exon encoding the evolutionarily conserved olfactomedin-homology domain of TIGR in familial open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(12):2091–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fingert JH, Stone EM, Sheffield VC, Alward WL. Myocilin glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(6):547–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mackey DA, Healey DL, Fingert JH, et al. Glaucoma phenotype in pedigrees with the myocilin Thr377Met mutation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(8):1172–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Niyadurupola N, Broadway DC. Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma—a major review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36(9):868–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Scuderi G, Contestabile MT, Scuderi L, Librando A, Fenicia V, Rahimi S. Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma: a review and update. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(7):1651–1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dorairaj SK, Robin A, Shihadeh W, Greenberg S, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Phenotypic variability of pigment dispersion syndrome in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):136–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sugar HS. Pigmentary glaucoma. A 25-year review. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62(3):499–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Siddiqui Y, Ten Hulzen RD, Cameron JD, Hodge DO, Johnson DH. What is the risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome? Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(6):794–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Andersen JS, Pralea AM, DelBono EA, et al. A gene responsible for the pigment dispersion syndrome maps to chromosome 7q35-q36. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(3):384–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Hewitt AW, et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42(10):906–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Burdon KP, Macgregor S, Hewitt AW, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for open angle glaucoma at TMCO1 and CDKN2B-AS1. Nat Genet. 2011; 43(6):574–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wiggs JL, Yaspan BL, Hauser MA, et al. Common variants at 9p21 and 8q22 are associated with increased susceptibility to optic nerve degeneration in glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4): e1002654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.van Koolwijk LM, Ramdas WD, Ikram MK, et al. Common genetic determinants of intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(5):e1002611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gharahkhani P, Burdon KP, Fogarty R, et al. Common variants near ABCA1, AFAP1 and GMDS confer risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1120–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen Y, Lin Y, Vithana EN, et al. Common variants near ABCA1 and in PMM2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1115–1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li Z, Allingham RR, Nakano M, et al. A common variant near TGFBR3 is associated with primary open angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(13):3880–3892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Springelkamp H, Iglesias AI, Cuellar-Partida G, et al. ARHGEF12 influences the risk of glaucoma by increasing intraocular pressure. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(9):2689–2699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bailey JN, Loomis SJ, Kang JH, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2 and FOXC1 as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016;48(2):189–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gharahkhani P, Burdon KP, Cooke Bailey JN, et al. Analysis combining correlated glaucoma traits identifies five new risk loci for open-angle glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shiga Y, Akiyama M, Nishiguchi KM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies seven novel susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(8): 1486–1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.MacGregor S, Ong JS, An J, et al. Genome-wide association study of intraocular pressure uncovers new pathways to glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(8):1067–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bonnemaijer PWM, Iglesias AI, Nadkarni GN, et al. Genome-wide association study of primary open-angle glaucoma in continental and admixed African populations. Hum Genet. 2018;137(10):847–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Choquet H, Paylakhi S, Kneeland SC, et al. A multiethnic genome-wide association study of primary open-angle glaucoma identifies novel risk loci. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Khawaja AP, Cooke Bailey JN, Wareham NJ, et al. Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(6):778–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Genetics of Glaucoma in People of African Descent C, Hauser MA, Allingham RR, et al. Association of genetic variants with primary open-angle glaucoma among individuals with African ancestry. JAMA. 2019;322(17):1682–1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tanigawa Y, Wainberg M, Karjalainen J, et al. Rare protein-altering variants in ANGPTL7 lower intraocular pressure and protect against glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2020;16(5):e1008682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Craig JE, Han X, Qassim A, et al. Multitrait analysis of glaucoma identifies new risk loci and enables polygenic prediction of disease susceptibility and progression. Nat Genet. 2020;52(2):160–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gharahkhani P, Jorgenson E, Hysi P, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Monemi S, Spaeth G, DaSilva A, et al. Identification of a novel adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) gene on 5q22.1. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(6):725–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295(5557):1077–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Fingert JH, Robin AL, Stone JL, et al. Copy number variations on chromosome 12q14 in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(12):2482–2494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, Sulem P, et al. Common sequence variants in the LOXL1 gene confer susceptibility to exfoliation glaucoma. Science. 2007;317(5843):1397–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Aung T, Ozaki M, Mizoguchi T, et al. A common variant mapping to CACNA1A is associated with susceptibility to exfoliation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2015;47(4):387–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Aung T, Ozaki M, Lee MC, et al. Genetic association study of exfoliation syndrome identifies a protective rare variant at LOXL1 and five new susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2017;49(7):993–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Vithana EN, Khor CC, Qiao C, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify three new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1142–1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Khor CC, Do T, Jia H, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016;48(5):556–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wiggs JL. Glaucoma genes and mechanisms. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;134:315–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Aboobakar IF, Johnson WM, Stamer WD, Hauser MA, Allingham RR. Major review: exfoliation syndrome; advances in disease genetics, molecular biology, and epidemiology. Exp Eye Res. 2017;154:88–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ritch R Exfoliation syndrome: beyond glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(6):859–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Aboobakar IF, Allingham RR. Genetics of exfoliation syndrome and glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2014;54(4):43–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kagan HM, Li W. Lysyl oxidase: properties, specificity, and biological roles inside and outside of the cell. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(4):660–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ronci M, Sharma S, Martin S, Craig JE, Voelcker NH. MALDI MS imaging analysis of apolipoprotein E and lysyl oxidase-like 1 in human lens capsules affected by pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Proteomics. 2013;82:27–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Khan TT, Li G, Navarro ID, et al. LOXL1 expression in lens capsule tissue specimens from individuals with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2236–2241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Pasutto F, Sommer P, et al. Genotype-correlated expression of lysyl oxidase-like 1 in ocular tissues of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and normal patients. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(6):1724–1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wiggs JL, Pawlyk B, Connolly E, et al. Disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier and lens abnormalities in mice lacking lysyl oxidase-like 1 (LOXL1). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(2):856–864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li G, Schmitt H, Johnson WM, et al. Integral role for lysyl oxidase-like-1 in conventional outflow tissue function and behavior. FASEB J. 2020;34(8):10762–10777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kim S, Kim Y. Variations in LOXL1 associated with exfoliation glaucoma do not affect amine oxidase activity. Mol Vis. 2012;18:265–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hauser MA, Aboobakar IF, Liu Y, et al. Genetic variants and cellular stressors associated with exfoliation syndrome modulate promoter activity of a lncRNA within the LOXL1 locus. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(22):6552–6563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Schmitt HM, Johnson WM, Aboobakar IF, et al. Identification and activity of the functional complex between hnRNPL and the pseudoexfoliation syndrome-associated lncRNA, LOXL1-AS1. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(12):1986–1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pasutto F, Zenkel M, Hoja U, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome-associated genetic variants affect transcription factor binding and alternative splicing of LOXL1. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Bernstein AM, Ritch R, Wolosin JM. LOXL1 folding in exfoliation glaucoma. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019;118: 273–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Igo RP, Kinzy TG, Cooke Bailey JN, et al. Distribution of rare LOXL1 missense alleles, haplotypes and diplotypes suggests association with reduced risk of glaucoma-related exfoliation syndrome. medRxiv. 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.08.05.21261676 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kortje KH, Erb C. Energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM) in the elemental analysis of pseudoexfoliative material. Curr Eye Res. 2001; 22(2):154–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Want A, Gillespie SR, Wang Z, et al. Autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction in Tenon fibroblasts from exfoliation glaucoma patients. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Jones R 3rd, Rhee DJ. Corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension and glaucoma: a brief review and update of the literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(2):163–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chan W, Wiggs JL, Sobrin L. The genetic influence on corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension: a field positioned for discovery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;202:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Friedman DS, Foster PJ, Aung T, He M. Angle closure and angle-closure glaucoma: what we are doing now and what we will be doing in the future. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012; 40(4):381–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Amerasinghe N, Aung T. Angle-closure: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:31–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kavitha S, Zebardast N, Palaniswamy K, et al. Family history is a strong risk factor for prevalent angle closure in a south Indian population. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2091–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lee MC, Chan AS, Goh SR, et al. Expression of the primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) susceptibility gene PLEKHA7 in endothelial and epithelial cell junctions in the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(6):3833–3841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Lee MC, Shei W, Chan AS, et al. Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) susceptibility gene PLEKHA7 encodes a novel Rac1/Cdc42 GAP that modulates cell migration and blood-aqueous barrier function. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(20):4011–4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. https://oculargenomics.meei.harvard.edu/services/genetic-diagnostic-testing-service/.
  • 124.Consugar MB, Navarro-Gomez D, Place EM, et al. Panel-based genetic diagnostic testing for inherited eye diseases is highly accurate and reproducible, and more sensitive for variant detection, than exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2015; 17(4):253–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gao XR, Huang H, Kim H. Polygenic risk score is associated with intraocular pressure and improves glaucoma prediction in the UK biobank cohort. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(2):10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Qassim A, Souzeau E, Siggs OM, et al. An intraocular pressure polygenic risk score stratifies multiple primary open-angle glaucoma parameters including treatment intensity. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(7):901–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Qassim A, Mullany S, Awadalla MS, et al. A polygenic risk score predicts intraocular pressure readings outside office hours and early morning spikes as measured by Home tonometry. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021;4(4):411–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zebardast N, Sekimitsu S, Wang J, et al. Characteristics of p. Gln368Ter Myocilin variant and influence of polygenic risk on glaucoma penetrance in the UKbiobank. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(9):1300–1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Liu C, Nongpiur ME, Cheng CY, et al. Evaluation of primary angle-closure glaucoma susceptibility loci for estimating angle closure disease severity. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(3):403–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kim J, Aschard H, Kang JH, et al. Intraocular pressure, glaucoma, and dietary caffeine consumption: a gene-diet interaction study from the UKbiobank. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(6): 866–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Alipanahi B, Hormozdiari F, Behsaz B, et al. Large-scale machine-learning-based phenotyping significantly improves genomic discovery for optic nerve head morphology. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(7):1217–1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337(6096):816–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Gillmore JD, Gane E, Taubel J, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(6):493–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lu Y, Xue J, Deng T, et al. Safety and feasibility of CRISPR-edited T cells in patients with refractory non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):732–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Jain A, Zode G, Kasetti RB, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-based treatment of myocilin-associated glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(42):11199–11204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Mirjalili Mohanna SZ, Hickmott JW, Lam SL, et al. Germline CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing prevents vision loss in a novel mouse model of Aniridia. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020;17:478–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES