Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;8:14. doi: 10.1186/s41016-022-00281-5

Table 1.

Results of document retrieval

First author (year) n Locationa Treatment Method Follow-up
(month)
Prognosis
Ghogawala Z (1996) [4] 1 distal microsurgery clipping 6 good
Hamel W (2005) [5] 1 middle microsurgery EC & wrapping 7 mild ataxia
Fiorella D (2006) [6] 2

distal

distal

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

single stent

stent-in-stent

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

Sanchez-Mejia RO (2007) [7] 3

distal

middle

middle

microsurgery

microsurgery

microsurgery

trapping & resection

trapping & resection

trapping & resection

unknown

unknown

unknown

good

good

good

Park SQ (2009) [3] 3

distal

distal

distal

conservative observation

conservative observation

conservative observation

16

16

1

good

good

good

Mathieson CS (2010) [8] 1 distal microsurgery clipping & resection 5 hydrocephalus & mild hypomnesia
Deshaies EM (2011) [9] 1 distal endovascular treatment stent-in-stent 6 good
Chen L (2012) [10] 2

middle

middle

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

coiling

coiling

24

18

hemiplagia

hemiplagia

Gross BA (2012) [11] 1 distal microsurgery clipping 12 hydrocephalus
Apok V (2013) [12] 1 distal microsurgery trapping & resection unknown hemiplagia & aphasia
Nyberg EM (2013) [13] 2

middle

middle

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

stent-in-stent

stent-in-stent

14

4

good

good

Ding D (2013) [14] 3

middle

distal

distal

conservative observation

conservative observation

endovascular treatment

Onyx occlusion

unknown

19

22

pontine infarction

good

hemiplagia

Sivakanthan S (2014) [15] 1 distal microsurgery clipping 6 good
Chalouhi N (2014) [16] 1 middle endovascular treatment flow diverter 6 good
Chavent A (2014) [17] 3

distal

distal

distal

conservative observation

conservative observation

conservative observation

6

12

6

good

good

good

Kim YJ (2014) [18] 1 distal endovascular treatment stent-in-stent unknown unknown
Daruwalla VJ (2016) [19] 1 distal conservative observation 1.5 good
Peschillo S (2016) [20] 3

distal

distal

distal

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

flow diverter

single stent & flow diverter

flow diverter

6

36

6

mild monoplagia

good

mild hemiplagia

Forbrig R (2016) [21] 8

distal

distal

distal

distal

distal

middle

middle

middle

conservative observation

conservative observation

endovascular treatment

conservative observation

endovascular treatment

conservative observation

conservative observation

conservative observation

onyx occlusion

coiling

6

6

60

5

23

11

15

78

hemiplagia & dysarthria

good

good

hydrocephalus & mild disgnosia

hydrocephalus & hemiplagia

hydrocephalus & hemiplagia

hydrocephalus & hemiplagia

good

Satti SR (2016) [22] 1 distal endovascular treatment overlapping 3 stents 7 good
Aboukais R (2016) [23] 1 distal conservative observation 1.5 good
Jiang Y (2016) [24] 1 proximal endovascular treatment microguidewire EC 6 good
Finitsis S (2017) [25] 4

distal

distal

middle

middle

conservative observation

conservative observation

endovascular treatment

conservative observation

flow diverter

1.5

12

3

1.5

good

mild HP

right dysacousis

good

Buell TJ (2017) [26] 2

middle

middle

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

stent-in-stent

stent-in-stent

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

Chau Y (2017) [27] 3

distal

distal

distal

conservative observation

endovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

stent-in-stent

coiling

stent-in-stent

12

6

6

good

good

good

aThe basilar trunk was divided averagely into three parts – distal, middle and proximal segments

n number of cases, EC electrocoagulation