Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;13:750245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245

Table 2.

Summary of effect size data from experimental studies reporting on the relative effect of exposure to natural and urban environments on positive and negative affect.

Study N Outcome
measure
Pos.
Aff., d
95% CI Neg.
Aff., d
95% CI
Berman et al. (2008) Study 1 72 PANAS 1.05 0.93, 1.17 - -
Berman et al. (2008) Study 2 24 PANAS 0.01 -0.31, 0.34 - -
Hartig et al. (1991) Study 2 22 ZIPERS 1.10 0.69, 1.51 -1.15 -1.56, -0.73
Hartig et al. (1991) Study 2 22 OHS 0.72 0.34, 1.1 - -
Hartig et al. (1999) Study 1 100 ZIPERS 0.43 0.35, 0.51 -0.71 -0.8, -0.63
Hartig et al. (2003) 112 ZIPERS 1.51 1.42, 1.6 -0.58 -0.65, -0.5
Ryan et al. (2010) Study 2 80 SVS 0.59 0.49, 0.69 - -
Ryan et al. (2010) Study 3 97 SVS 0.76 0.67, 0.85 - -
Sheets and Manzer (1991) Study 1 168 Affective Pleasure 0.68 0.63, 0.73 - -
Sheets and Manzer (1991) Study 2 69 Affective Pleasure 1.07 0.94, 1.2 - -
Ulrich et al. (1991) 120 ZIPERS F - - -0.58 -0.66, -0.5
Ulrich et al. (1991) 120 ZIPERS A/A - - -0.88 -0.96, -0.8
Ulrich et al. (1991) 120 ZIPERS PA 1.42 1.33, 1.51 - -
Ulrich et al. (1991) 120 ZIPERS S - - -0.21 -0.28, -0.13
Ulrich et al. (1991) 120 ZIPERS A/I 0.32 0.25, 0.4 - -
Mayer et al. (2009) Study 1 76 PANAS 0.65 0.19, 1.11 0.15 -0.32, 0.61
Mayer et al. (2009) Study 2 62 PANAS 0.63 0.12, 1.14 0.06 -0.45, 0.57
Nisbet and Zelenski (2011) Study 1 73 PANAS 1.15 0.65, 1.65 -0.50 -1, -0.01
Nisbet and Zelenski (2011) Study 2 80 PANAS 1.45 0.95, 1.94 -0.49 -0.99, 0
Tennessen and Cimprich (1995) 36 POMS Total - - -0.41 -1.13, 0.32
Tennessen and Cimprich (1995) 36 POMS D-D - - -0.44 -1.17, 0.29
White et al. (2010) Study 1 80 Subj. Happiness 1.27 0.79, 1.76 - -
Reeves et al. (2019) 68 PANAS 0.42 -0.06, 0.9 - -
Stewart and Haaga (2018) 94 PANAS 0.47 0.06, 0.88 -0.56 -0.97, -0.15
Golding et al. (2018) 38 PANAS 0.87 0.2, 1.54 0.00 0, 0
McAllister et al. (2017) 144 PANAS 0.42 0.09, 0.75 -0.42 -0.75, -0.09
McAllister et al. (2017) 148 PANAS -0.09 -0.41, 0.23 -0.52 -0.84, -0.2
Lee et al. (2009) 22 Subj. Comfort 2.59 1.46, 3.72 - -
Park et al. (2007) 24 Subj. Comfort 3.43 2.17, 4.69 - -
Park et al. (2007) 24 Subj. Calm 1.69 0.75, 2.62 - -
van den Berg et al. (2003) 106 POMS D-D - - -0.70 -1.08, -0.32
van den Berg et al. (2003) 106 POMS A-H - - -0.82 -1.2, -0.44
van den Berg et al. (2003) 106 POMS T-A - - -0.45 -0.83, -0.07
van den Berg et al. (2003) 106 OHS 0.63 0.24, 1.02 - -
Tyrväinen et al. (2014) 154 PANAS 0.72 0.39, 1.05 -0.49 -0.82, -0.17
Tyrväinen et al. (2014) 154 SVS 0.22 -0.09, 0.54 - -
Olafsdottir et al. (2018) 44 PANAS 1.03 0.4, 1.67 -0.72 -1.35, -0.09
Olafsdottir et al. (2018) 44 PANAS 0.86 0.24, 1.48 -0.64 -1.26, -0.02
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS T-A - - -1.14 -1.54, -0.73
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS D-D - - -0.12 -0.52, 0.29
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS A-H - - -0.48 -0.89, -0.08
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS F-I - - -0.16 -0.57, 0.24
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS C-B - - - -
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS V-A 0.37 -0.04, 0.77 - -
Stigsdotter et al. (2017) 94 POMS Total - - -0.54 -0.95, -0.14
Brown et al. (2013) 46 PANAS -0.07 -0.65, 0.51 -0.44 -1.02, 0.14
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS T-A - - -1.39 -1.75, -1.04
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS D-D - - -1.01 -1.37, -0.65
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS A-H - - -1.33 -1.69, -0.98
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS V-A 0.00 -0.36, 0.36 - -
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS F-I - - -1.55 -1.91, -1.19
Shin et al. (2011) 120 POMS C-B - - -1.58 -1.93, -1.22
Beute and de Kort (2014) Study 2 60 Hedonic Tone 0 -0.51, 0.51 - -
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS T-A - - -0.57 -1.1, -0.04
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS D-D - - -0.52 -1.06, 0.01
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS A-H - - -0.43 -0.96, 0.1
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS F-I - - -0.79 -1.33, -0.26
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS C-B - - -0.71 -1.24, -0.18
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 POMS V-A 0.65 0.1, 1.2 - -
Bielinis et al. (2018) 54 PANAS 0.63 0.08, 1.18 -0.5 -1.04, 0.05
Geniole et al. (2016) 31 Pos. Mood 1.84 1.24, 2.43 - -
Janeczko et al. (2020) 40 PANAS -0.37 -1.01, 0.26 -0.28 -0.91, 0.35
Johansson et al. (2011) 20 NMS A/D - - 0.02 -0.6, 0.64
Johansson et al. (2011) 20 NMS A - - -0.1 -0.72, 0.52
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS T-A - - -1.78 -2.29, -1.27
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS D-D - - -1.01 -1.52, -0.5
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS A-H - - -0.88 -1.38, -0.37
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS F-I - - -0.99 -1.5, -0.49
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS C-B - - -1.45 -1.96, -0.95
Liu et al. (2021) 30 POMS V-A 1.98 1.36, 2.6 - -
Lopes et al. (2020) 62 PANAS 0.92 0.39, 1.44 -0.82 -1.35, -0.3
Neale et al. (2021) Study 1 45 Hedonic Tone 0.64 0.21, 1.06 - -
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS T-A - - -0.83 -1.24, -0.41
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS D-D - - -0.32 -0.74, 0.09
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS A-H - - -0.34 -0.75, 0.07
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS F-I - - -0.71 -1.12, -0.3
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS C-B - - -0.71 -1.12, -0.3
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 POMS V-A 0.96 0.52, 1.39 - -
Takayama et al. (2014) 45 PANAS 0.24 -0.17, 0.66 -0.63 -1.05, -0.22
Brooks et al. (2017) Study 1 120 PANAS 0.27 -0.09, 0.63 - -
Brooks et al. (2017) Study 2 58 PANAS 0.14 -0.37, 0.66 -0.42 -0.94, 0.09
Jiang et al. (2021) 17 Mood 1.65 0.53, 2.76 - -
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS T-A - - -0.73 -1.57, 0.1
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS D-D - - -0.29 -1.12, 0.55
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS A-H - - -0.7 -1.54, 0.14
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS V-A 0.66 -0.2, 1.52 - -
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS F-I - - -0.83 -1.66, 0.01
Lee et al. (2015a) 11 POMS C-B - - -0.51 -1.34, 0.33
Navalta et al. (2021) 10 Subj. Calm 1.09 0.15, 2.03 - -
Navalta et al. (2021) 10 Subj. Comfort 1.3 0.34, 2.27 - -
Nisbet et al. (2019) 65 PANAS 0.98 0.46, 1.49 -0.24 -0.75, 0.28
Pasca et al. (2021) 306 PANAS 6.47 5.91, 7.03 -7.5 -8.06, -6.95
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS T-A - - -0.61 -1.28, 0.06
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS D-D - - -0.57 -1.25, 0.1
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS A-H - - -0.57 -1.24, 0.11
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS V-A 0.57 -0.12, 1.25 - -
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS F-I - - -0.47 -1.14, 0.2
Song et al. (2014) 17 POMS C-B - - -0.41 -1.08, 0.27
Song et al. (2014) 13 Subj. Comfort 1.55 0.68, 2.43 - -
Ballew and Omoto (2018) 100 Pos. Emotions 0.58 0.18, 0.98 - -
Bratman et al. (2015) 60 PANAS -0.42 -0.93, 0.09 -0.52 -1.03, -0.01
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS D-D - - 0.17 -0.45, 0.79
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS A-H - - 0.18 -0.44, 0.8
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS F-I - - 0.31 -0.31, 0.93
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS C-B - - 0.39 -0.23, 1.01
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS V-A -0.26 -0.89, 0.36 - -
Pretty et al. (2005) 40 POMS T-A - - 0.17 -0.45, 0.79
Koselka et al. (2019) 38 PANAS 0.65 0.54, 0.76 - -

Dash(–) indicates information not reported. For ZIPERS: F, Fear; A/A, Anger/Aggression; PA, Positive Affect; S, Sadness; A/I, Attentiveness/Interest. For POMS: T-A, Tension-Anxiety; D-D, Depression-Dejection; A-H, Anger-Hostility; V-A, Vigor Activity; F-I, Fatigue-Inertia; C-B, Confusion-Bewilderment. NMS, Negative Mood Scale. For NMS A/D, Anxiety/Depression, A, Anger.