Skip to main content
. 2022 May 18;14(10):4459–4470. doi: 10.18632/aging.204086

Table 3. Summary of the meta-analysis results.

Analysis NU Model OR (95% CI) I2 (%) P
Stroke associated infections 6 Rem 0.87 [0.47, 1.60] 88 0.65
Subgroup1: Stroke type
Ischemic stroke 4 Rem 0.53 [0.18, 1.55] 88 0.24
Hemorrhage stroke 1 Fem 0.22 [0.09, 0.57] - 0.002
Both type 1 Fem 1.92 [1.53, 2.42] - <0.00001
Subgroup2: Study design
Case-control study 5 Rem 0.71 [0.33, 1.53] 90 0.26
Cohort study 1 Fem 1.88 [1.16, 3.05] - <0.00001
Subgroup3: NIHSS
NIHSS>10 2 Rem 0.90 [0.20, 4.05] 92 0.89
5<NIHSS<10 2 Fem 1.85 [1.51, 2.26] 0 <0.00001
N 2 Fem 0.28 [0.14, 0.56] 0 0.00008
Stroke associated pneumonia 6 Rem 0.76 [0.38, 1.51] 86 0.43
Subgroup1: Stroke type
Ischemic stroke 4 Rem 0.77 [0.38, 1.54] 84 0.46
Hemorrhage stroke 1 Fem 0.22 [0.09, 0.57] - 0.002
Both type 1 Fem 1.92 [1.39, 2.65] - <0.0001
Subgroup2: Study design
Case-control study 5 Rem 0.61 [0.31, 1.20] 79 0.15
Cohort study 1 Fem 1.92 [1.39, 2.65] - <0.0001
Subgroup3: NIHSS
NIHSS>10 2 Rem 0.69 [0.47, 1.02] 79 0.06
5<NIHSS<10 2 Fem 1.85 [1.51, 2.26] 0 <0.0001
N 2 Fem 0.29 [0.14, 0.60] 0 0.0008
UTI 3 Fem 1.69 [1.33, 2.14] 0 <0.0001
Sepsis 2 Fem 1.35 [0.71, 2.54] 27 0.36

Abbreviations: NU: number of articles; Rem: random effects models; Fem: fix effects models; OR: odd ratios; CI: confidence interval; Both type: patients with ischemic or hemorrhage stroke; N: not given.