Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 11;50(11):1381–1397. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00937-x

Table 5.

Hierarchical regression analyses predicting early academic performance at Time 1 and 2 from neuropsychological deficits at Time 1

Word Reading Numeration
Time 1 Time 2 Time 1 Time 2
ΔR 2 ß ΔR 2 ß ΔR 2 ß ΔR 2 ß
Step 1: Covariatesa 0.27*** 0.23*** 0.36*** 0.26***
Step 2: IAC 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.06+
 KCPT omission error 0.01 0.03 − 0.17* − 0.17+
 KCPT commission error − 0.07 0.01 0.08 0.00
 DeFT − 0.02 0.01 − 0.01 − 0.18+
Step 2: DAv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
 MIDA − 0.06 − 0.02 0.00 0.08
Step 2: TP/WM 0.06* 0.06+ 0.03+ 0.05
 Picture location − 0.10 − 0.21+ − 0.04 − 0.30*
 Time discrimination − 0.20* − 0.17 − 0.08 0.04
 Time reproduction − 0.07 0.05 − 0.17* − 0.05
Step 2: 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.11+
 KCPT omission error 0.04 0.07 − 0.15* − 0.14
 KCPT commission error − 0.04 0.03 0.09 − 0.00
 DeFT − 0.04 − 0.00 − 0.02 − 0.17+
 MIDA − 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.13
 Picture location − 0.08 − 0.23+ − 0.04 − 0.29*
 Time discrimination − 0.21* − 0.18 − 0.07 0.03
 Time reproduction − 0.08 0.03 − 0.16* 0.00

Note. + p < .10; * p < .05; *** p < .001. Standardized regression coefficients (β) of the variables at the final step of each analysis are given.

a Age, general ability, treatment condition, and monthly household income were included as covariates.

IAC = Inhibitory and attentional control deficit; DAv = Delay aversion; TP/WM = Time perception/working memory deficit; KCPT = Conners’ Kiddie Continuous Performance Test; DeFT = Delay frustration task; MIDA = Maudsley Index of Childhood Delay Aversion.