Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD000084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000084.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. External cephalic version (ECV) commenced before term versus ECV at term for breech presentation before term.

External cephalic version (ECV) commenced before term versus ECV at term for breech presentation before term
Population: women with breech presentation before term
 Settings: 3 trials, 2 multicentre and 1 in Pakistan
 Intervention: external cephalic version (ECV) commenced before term
 Comparison: external cephalic version at term
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
External cephalic version at term External cephalic version (ECV) commenced before term
Non‐cephalic presentation at the birth Study population RR 0.81 
 (0.74 to 0.9) 1906
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
523 per 1000 424 per 1000 
 (387 to 471)
Moderate
517 per 1000 419 per 1000 
 (383 to 465)
Vaginal cephalic birth not achieved (caesarean section + vaginal breech birth) Study population RR 0.9 
 (0.83 to 0.97) 1888
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
600 per 1000 540 per 1000 
 (498 to 582)
Moderate
633 per 1000 570 per 1000 
 (525 to 614)
Caesarean section Study population RR 0.92 
 (0.85 to 1) 1888
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
565 per 1000 519 per 1000 
 (480 to 565)
Moderate
560 per 1000 515 per 1000 
 (476 to 560)
Vaginal breech birth Study population RR 0.44 
 (0.25 to 0.78) 1888
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
35 per 1000 15 per 1000 
 (9 to 27)
Moderate
26 per 1000 11 per 1000 
 (6 to 20)
Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes Study population RR 1.16 
 (0.39 to 3.44) 1759
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1  
7 per 1000 8 per 1000 
 (3 to 23)
Moderate
11 per 1000 13 per 1000 
 (4 to 38)
Perinatal mortality (Stillbirth or neonatal mortality < 7 days) Study population RR 0.23 
 (0.04 to 1.34) 1887
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1  
5 per 1000 1 per 1000 
 (0 to 7)
Moderate
9 per 1000 2 per 1000 
 (0 to 12)
Preterm birth < 37 weeks Study population RR 1.51 
 (1.03 to 2.21) 1888
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
43 per 1000 66 per 1000 
 (45 to 96)
Moderate
44 per 1000 66 per 1000 
 (45 to 97)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Wide 95% CI crossing the line of no effect and low event rate.