Table 6.
Associations between demographics and fruit/vegetable serving quantity (N = 91)
| 100% juice | Fruit | Lettuce salad | French fries/fried potatoes | Other white potatoes | Cooked dried beans | Other vegetables | Tomato sauce | Vegetable soup | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age1 | − 0.21 | 0.02 | − 0.17 | − 0.35** |
− 0.23* 0 |
− 0.18 | − 0.06 | − 0.13 | − 0.16 |
| Gender2 | * | ||||||||
| Female | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 0.79 |
| Male | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.26 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.52 | 0.87 |
| Race3 | |||||||||
| White | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.40 | 0.72 |
| Black | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.26 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.86 | 0.43 | 0.85 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 1.03 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
| Asian | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.74 | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.33 | 0.78 |
| Other | 1.04 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.37 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.13 | 0.80 | 1.13 |
| Material status2 | |||||||||
| Married | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.28 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 0.49 | 0.87 |
| Other | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.46 | 0.81 |
| Education2 | |||||||||
| High school or below | 1.06 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.25 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
| Some college or higher | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.31 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.85 |
| Income2 | |||||||||
| < $50,000 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.78 |
| ≥ $50,000 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.35 | 0.90 |
1Pearson’s r, 2Independent t test, 3ANOVA
†p < 0.1, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, two-tailed
†This value shows marginal significance. It is included in the notes of Table 6 to maintain uniformity among the notes in tables 4, 5, and 6
**p < 0.001 This is a value of statistical significance. It is included in the notes of Tables 5 and 6 to maintain the uniformity of the notes in Tables 4, 5, and 6