Table 3.
Level of evidence of a sentence with a phenotype definition (Rule-based final decisions)
| Rule | Rule description | Level of evidence | Final Decision | Number of Sentences (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | If INC = True and ITC = False and EXC = False | The sentence shows strong evidence of a phenotype definition | Positive | 1222 (30.77%) | |
| R2 | If INC = True and ITC = True and EXC = False | The sentence shows strong evidence of a phenotype definition | |||
| R3 | If INC = True and ITC = True and EXC = True | The sentence shows strong intermediate evidence of a phenotype definition due to the presence of any of the Exclusion criteria | Intermediate I | 701 (17.65%) | |
| R4 | If INC = True and ITC = False and EXC = True | The sentence shows strong intermediate evidence of a phenotype definition due to the presence of any of the Exclusion criteria | |||
| R5 | If INC = False and ITC = True and EXC = False | The sentence shows weak intermediate evidence of a phenotype definition due to the absence of any of the Inclusion criteria, but the presence of any of the intermediate criteria | Intermediate II | 914 (23.01%) | |
| R6 | If INC = False and ITC = True and EXC = True | The sentence shows weak intermediate evidence of a phenotype definition due to the absence of any of the Inclusion criteria, but the presence of any of the intermediate criteria | |||
| R7 | If INC = False and ITC = False and EXC = True | The sentence shows no evidence of a phenotype definition | Negative | 1134 (28.55%) | |
INC Inclusion conclusion, ITC Intermediate conclusion, EXC Exclusion conclusion