Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;2022(6):CD013030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013030.pub2

Cvietusa 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
Duration: 1 year follow‐up
Setting: children with persistent asthma
Participants Population: total 1393 children: 290 in the intervention group vs 303 in the control group
Age: 3 to 12 years old
Interventions Intervention: received up to 3 tailored speech recognition reminder calls when they were due to refill their ICS. The calls provided information about asthma, facilitated a rapid ICS refill, and offered an opportunity to receive a call back from an asthma nurse specialist
Control: usual care (no reminders)
Outcomes Time to first ICS refill; proportion of days with medication on hand
Notes Type of publication: abstract only
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation occurred but no detail given on how
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No allocation concealment described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinding unlikely to have been achieved but unlikely to have affected ICS refill
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk No blinding of outcome assessors described; adherence monitored by prescription refill so unlikely affected by knowledge of intervention group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No loss of follow‐up data reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Methods did not describe what outcomes were planned