Cvietusa 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Design: randomised controlled trial Duration: 1 year follow‐up Setting: children with persistent asthma |
|
Participants |
Population: total 1393 children: 290 in the intervention group vs 303 in the control group Age: 3 to 12 years old |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: received up to 3 tailored speech recognition reminder calls when they were due to refill their ICS. The calls provided information about asthma, facilitated a rapid ICS refill, and offered an opportunity to receive a call back from an asthma nurse specialist Control: usual care (no reminders) |
|
Outcomes | Time to first ICS refill; proportion of days with medication on hand | |
Notes | Type of publication: abstract only | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation occurred but no detail given on how |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No allocation concealment described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding unlikely to have been achieved but unlikely to have affected ICS refill |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding of outcome assessors described; adherence monitored by prescription refill so unlikely affected by knowledge of intervention group |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No loss of follow‐up data reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Methods did not describe what outcomes were planned |