TABLE 2.

Results of main effects from logistic regression models examining the likelihood of identifying as following any meat-reduced dietary practice (vegetarian, vegan, or pescatarian) and each practice individually, adjusted for sociodemographic factors¹

Country comparison	Any meat-reduced dietary pattern AOR (99% CI)	Vegetarian AOR (99% CI)	Vegan AOR (99% CI)	Pescatarian AOR (99% CI)
Australia vs. Canada	1.26 (1.07–1.47)2	1.22 (0.97–1.54)	1.12 (0.83–1.50)	1.37 (1.04–1.80)2
Australia vs. Mexico	1.20 (1.01–1.41)2	1.40 (1.09–1.81)2	0.68 (0.52–0.89)2	1.95 (1.42–2.69)2
Australia vs. UK	0.87 (0.75–1.01)	0.87 (0.70–1.08)	0.96 (0.72–1.27)	0.83 (0.65–1.08)
Australia vs. US	0.97 (0.83–1.13)	1.07 (0.85–1.35)	0.65 (0.50–0.86)2	1.33 (0.99–1.79)
Canada vs. Mexico	0.95 (0.80–1.13)	1.15 (0.88–1.49)	0.60 (0.46–0.80)2	1.43 (1.03–1.98)2
Canada vs. UK	0.69 (0.59–0.81)2	0.71 (0.57–0.89)2	0.86 (0.64–1.15)	0.61 (0.47–0.79)2
Canada vs. US	0.77 (0.66–0.91)2	0.87 (0.69–1.11)	0.58 (0.44–0.78)2	0.97 (0.72–1.32)
Mexico vs. UK	0.73 (0.62–0.85)2	0.62 (0.49–0.79)2	1.42 (1.09–1.84)2	0.43 (0.31–0.58)2
Mexico vs. US	0.81 (0.69–0.96)2	0.76 (0.59–0.98)2	0.97 (0.75–1.24)	0.68 (0.48–0.96)2
UK vs. US	1.11 (0.95–1.30)	1.22 (0.97–1.54)	0.68 (0.52–0.89)2	1.60 (1.18–2.15)

¹Adjusted for year, sex, age, ethnicity, education level, income adequacy, and BMI. The second category is the reference category. AOR, adjusted odds ratio.

²Significant at a P value < 0.01 in adjusted models.