TABLE 4.
Results of main effects from logistic regression models examining the likelihood of trying to consume less of any animal-source products (red meat, all meats, or dairy) and each source individually, adjusted for sociodemographic factors1
| Country comparison | Efforts to consume less of any animal-source product AOR (99% CI) | Efforts to consume less red meat AOR (99% CI) | Efforts to consume less of all meats AOR (99% CI) | Efforts to consume less dairy AOR (99% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia vs. Canada | 0.96 (0.87–1.06) | 0.91 (0.82–1.00)2 | 1.12 (0.83–1.50) | 1.37 (1.04–1.80)2 |
| Australia vs. Mexico | 0.51 (0.46–0.56)2 | 0.68 (0.61–0.75)2 | 0.68 (0.52–0.89)2 | 1.95 (1.42–2.69)2 |
| Australia vs. UK | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.83 (0.75–0.91)2 | 0.96 (0.72–1.27) | 0.83 (0.65–1.08) |
| Australia vs. US | 0.90 (0.82–1.00)2 | 0.90 (0.81–1.00)2 | 0.65 (0.50–0.86)2 | 1.33 (0.99–1.79) |
| Canada vs. Mexico | 0.53 (0.48–0.59)2 | 0.75 (0.67–0.83)2 | 0.60 (0.46–0.80)2 | 1.43 (1.03–1.98)2 |
| Canada vs. UK | 0.95 (0.87–1.05) | 0.91 (0.83–1.01) | 0.86 (0.64–1.15) | 0.61 (0.47–0.79)2 |
| Canada vs. US | 0.94 (0.85–1.04) | 1.00 (0.90–1.10) | 0.58 (0.44–0.78)2 | 0.97 (0.72–1.32) |
| Mexico vs. UK | 1.80 (1.63–1.99)2 | 1.22 (1.10–1.35)2 | 1.42 (1.09–1.84)2 | 0.43 (0.31–0.58)2 |
| Mexico vs. US | 1.77 (1.60–1.97)2 | 1.33 (1.20–1.47)2 | 0.97 (0.75–1.24) | 0.68 (0.48–0.96)2 |
| UK vs. US | 0.98 (0.89–1.08) | 1.09 (0.99–1.20) | 0.68 (0.52–0.89)2 | 1.60 (1.18–2.15)2 |
1
Adjusted for year, sex, age, ethnicity, education level, income adequacy, and BMI. The second category is the reference category. AOR, adjusted odds ratio.
2
Significant at a P value < 0.01 in adjusted models.