Table 3.

Psychological rehabilitation treatment

Reference	Age, years	Sample	Measurements	Treatment	Result
Mankad A et al. 2009 [39]	Average 21.93	15 Men 7 Women 8	IES POMS Becton Dickinson Immunological parameters reagent immune assay protocol	Writing sessions over three consecutive days	Pre-intervention (baseline): T1–T3 Three-day intervention: T4 Post-intervention (follow-up): T5–T6 (1) Participants reported high scores of intrusive thoughts and avoidance behaviours and showed a slow decline during the baseline time point. (2) After intervention T4, the score immediately showed a rise. However, 3-days intervention appeared to hasten the decline in individuals according to the slopes for intrusion and avoidance.
McArdle S. 2010 [7]	18	Men 1	/ (Case study)	(1) Dispute (2) Informal modelling (3) Systematic self-desensitization (4) Time projection	After the 4-month initial meeting, the athlete indicated that his flashbacks had decreased considerably.
Chen F et al. 2022 [40]	19–23	64	SASRQ	(1) Supporting (2) Cognitive-behavioural intervention (3) Relaxation training (4) Social support	The SASRD score was significantly lower than the scores post-intervention.

IES Impact of Event Scale, A-POMS Abbreviated Profile of Mood States, CD-RISC Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, SASRQ Stanford Acute Stress Response Questionnaire